elisi: Edwin holding a tiny snowman (Spangel almost kissing by amavel_bel)
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2006-11-29 10:26 am
Entry tags:

Random...

Hello there! I'm around - honestly. Just... busy. Having a life is seriously awkward. But - I have a question: Does anyone know where I could find a Christmas banner? It's almost December and I'd like to decorate! :)

***

The central theme of S3 of AtS is 'deception' I think - or maybe 'secrets and lies'. *Everyone* keeps secrets, and usually the outcome is dire. Anyone feel like writing about that in detail is more than welcome! Which is my roundabout way of telling you that AOQ is really coming round to AtS. From his review of 'Tomorrow':

Thoughts on Season Three:
Finally ATS comes into its own. Even with the forays into melodrama and the ill-advised diversions mid-season, Angel had momentum this year and stuck with it. S3 started a bit slow, but episodes like "Billy" and "Lullaby" are a good demonstration of how to build to transitional episodes that can be the belated climax of old stories while starting new ones... a skill that they'd perfected by the time of "Forgiving." I was worried about post-Sahjhan letdown, but Connor's story snapped very effectively into place, while continuing the ATS tradition of being a very inward-looking show, about individuals and angst rather than apocalypse-plurals. It could be argued that the difference compared to S2 is that S3 used more series-specific players and fewer Buffy holdovers, but that's more coincidence than anything else; the Darla arc last year was also something that felt like it could only be done on ATS. But although S2 reached some high peaks, it was hampered at every turn by the show's frustratingly persistent inability to properly resolve the fascinating stories it set up; I remember S2 just as much for disappointments like "Redefinition" and its immediate follow-ups, "Epiphany," and of course Pylea. Not so much of that in the final third of this season - and this time it's really the final third that dominates my perceptions of S3, since the period from "Loyalty" on is easily the best continuous run in ATS's lifetime.


Me? I've been mostly squeeing over Wesley... *deeeeep sigh* (And you should all watch here by Luminosity! Go!)

***

And finally... I've got a new plot bunny! I'll blame it on [livejournal.com profile] germaine_pet, although the other S/A shippers on my flist can also claim responsibility if they want. It's the sequel to 'Maybe Someday' - Spike, Angel and Illyria trying to defeat the Senior Partners - which I've been avoiding because I suck at plot and didn't have a clue how to proceed. Well now I do - only the big main outlines, but I can see how it's supposed to go and I'm itching to write. And it'll have a very definite S/A slant... (not lots of fighting interspersed with sex - actually no sex at all - nor any handholding and Spike won't be calling Angel 'Sire', so probably not recognisably Spangel-y to anyone except me, but... pretty vampires with lots of history!) So, if you don't see me around, it's because I'm trying to finish all my WIPs so I can concentrate on my shiny new bunny!

ETA: I will not be breaking the pretty Spuffy - don't worry!
shapinglight: (spangel silhoutte)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2006-11-29 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree that the latter half of S3 is probably one of the best runs ever on AtS - from Loyalty onwards - but I adore Darla so much that my favourite ever episodes of the show have to the three surrounding the birth of Connor.

Have never been able to understand why people don't like this season (unless they're disappointed Bangels who don't like the Angel/Cordy stuff).

As for your interpretation of Spangel - it's perfectly Spangel-ly. All that sire stuff is fun but it's fanon, not canon. I like to play with it - in fact, I love to play with it - but I'm happy to read a more AtS season 5 canon version of the relationship too.
molly_may: (Angel Analrapist - nicole_anell)

[personal profile] molly_may 2006-11-29 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Have never been able to understand why people don't like this season

::waves hand wildly:: Me! Me! I don't like it!! Heh. I find Holtz to be the most tedious villain in all of the Jossverse, but worse than that is that all of the main characters turn so grim and humorless and smug and self-righteous ("Champion" ugh) that I don't like any of them anymore. I don't start liking them again until the Jasmine arc. Maybe my reasons for disliking S3 stem from the fact that for me, plot is completely secondary to characterization, so even if the plotting of late S3 is tight (I've never thought it was, but I should watch it again before making any firm statements), it doesn't matter because I don't care about any of the characters anymore.
molly_may: (Guide you - sdwolfpup)

[personal profile] molly_may 2006-11-30 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
I guess the difference to me is that the S6 Buffy characters are the opposite of self-righteous. They've fallen into a grey zone where they don't know what the right things to do are anymore, and they struggle throughout the season to be good people, with both successes and failures. The fact that the characters *have* faults is constantly addressed. The Angel S3 crew, on the other hand, are positive that they're on the side of the um, angels. From Angel who constantly refers to himself as a "champion", to Wes with his martyr complex, to Cordy with her non-specific glowy demon powers, they all spend the season being so sanctimonious. I don't get any pleasure from watching them fail, because they don't even realize they're failing, which means that they don't get any moments that I find redemptive. And of course, it doesn't help that I simply don't like the Connor storyline, and don't find any of it compelling.

As for Holtz, I get what the writers were doing with him, it just doesn't work for me. Holtz does manage to out-Angel Angel in being more broody and monotonous than Angel is, but that doesn't exactly endear him to me.:)
shapinglight: (Default)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2006-11-29 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Although of course that way Joss would have had to break them up.)

Exactly - unless PC caught up with him and he didn't dare.

I don't think Frimfram's On the Rocks reads like fanon, though of course Angel's human in that.
shapinglight: (spangel silhoutte)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2006-11-29 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
No, it makes perfect sense.

I think among Spangel 'shippers, there's a sort of unvoiced belief that Angelus and Spike were shagging like bunnies back in the bad old days and so would quite easily start doing it again if given half the chance (the only being intimate 'that one time' referring to Angel and Spike, not Spike and Angelus, of course).

However, it does still need some setting up, in spite of that since there's as much hate as there is love in their relationship. I dunno with On the Rocks. I have the impression that something had happened before Angel shanshu'ed that made it only too obvious that when they met up again, this is what they would do. However, I can't remember and would have to re-read it (no hardship at all, obviously).
shapinglight: (spangel silhoutte)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2006-11-30 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Extend the time frame and you have Spike/Angel. Also of course they're MEN and don't talk about their feelings.

Heh! True. It's possible the fact that they're men makes it more likely they'd start shagging again at very short notice without discussing it first (and they wouldn't discuss it afterwards either) but maybe not. Maybe it makes it less likely.
shapinglight: (spangel)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2006-11-29 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you. That's very kind of you.

I can't ever imagine it being easy or romantic between those two. Spike would rather die first.