elisi: Edwin holding a tiny snowman (Smile Fan by buttersideup)
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2007-09-14 09:11 pm
Entry tags:

Since people are discussing it anyway... my thoughts on S8!Buffy...

OK this? Is *hugely* subjective. And somewhat tongue-in-cheek. If you love S8!Buffy maybe you should just stay clear... (I'm off to spend the evening snuggled up to Darcy, and then I'm going to bed. Might not answer comments, OK?)

Simply put - I don’t like that castle. Thinking about it a bit, it occurred to me that Voll might be easier to understand that it would at first appear. He’s up against an organisation that:

- Has secret headquarters in remote parts of the world.
- Uses helicopters and various high tech equipment for (secret) missions.
- Has a charimsatic leader (with a few doubles to confuse assassins) and an army of loyal, superpowered girls.

Exchange ‘superpowered girls’ with ‘henchmen’ and you have a *classic* Evil Overlord scenario. I mean - seriously. Just think about it for a minute. Of course Buffy isn’t evil, she’s trying to rid the world of badness, but... Didn’t any number of Evil Overlords claim the same? Just look at Jasmine.

The thing is, I just really, really don’t like the fact that she’s stuck in that castle. Has anyone in the entire comic so far interacted with a person who isn’t a Slayer, Scoobie or demon (except for Underground!Buffy talking to her friends before being called)? Joss’ Slayers are saving the world, but they’re not a part of it.

What happened to the Buffy who didn’t just go slaying, she had to look good too (and no, asking fellow Slayers for fashion tips does *not* count!)? The Buffy who wanted to be prom queen? The Buffy who was always, always reaching out to the ordinary people around her? The Buffy who worried if she needed to buy more cereal? The Buffy who loved dancing?

It’s very simple - she’s in Rome, Italy. A country full of sunshine and warmth and LIFE! A place that is old, from whence the whole world was once ruled. (Interestingly, they got as far as Northern England and then didn’t go any further. Scotland was off the map of Ancient Rome...)

I like Buffy being in Rome - the girl from the New World in the ancient city (there's a lot of nice themes or metaphors wrapped up in that, but I don't have time to delve). Trying to get to grips with a new language, actually living amidst history (which is a subject she enjoys!), a place full of passion and vividness, wonderful food and a wholesome appetite for life, generally.

Because the thing is, in their last moments together, Spike told Buffy:

‘It’s your world up there.’

I don’t care if the line didn’t make it onto screen, this was still his message to her - an echo of his song in OMWF:

‘You have to go on living. So one of us is living.’

The Buffy who’s in Rome understood that. She might be the head of a thousand strong Slayer army, but she also has time for shopping and dancing and snuggling up with her gorgeous immortal lover, who might or might not be evil. She has a type, and she’s finally stopped worrying about it.

Compared to S8!Buffy, living in what is practically a convent, and lusting after/having nightmares about her best friend because he’s the only male within a 50 mile radius... well... I’m reminded of this (from Triangle):

BUFFY: So, um, a-about being a nun... you know, um, with the whole ... abjuring the company of men ... you know, how's that working for you? The... abjuring.
NUN: Um ... good.
BUFFY: Yeah, do you, do you have to be like super-religious?
NUN: Well, uh...
BUFFY: How's the food?


I dunno. It’s not that she can’t be miserable in Rome (or wherever), it’s that she’s so particularly cut off in that castle...

And, to quote shapinglight:

The castle is just silly and what's more, the Queen is getting jolly fed up of living in the gamekeeper's cottage. She wants those strange Americans to move out now.

[identity profile] thedeadlyhook.livejournal.com 2007-09-15 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Them trying to figure out what side they're on (or what side they could potentially be on) is not the foundation of the story; it IS the story. It needs to be ambiguous, and it needs to be a gradual thing. It's just a pity that comics - five minutes of story a month - isn't exactly the best format for that kind of storytelling...

That's kind of what I was thinking of, the awkwardness of the format for telling that sort of story. After all, S5 Angel was essentially about slow corruption, but as viewers we were reminded constantly that W&H was a Bad Place, and that the heroes were wrestling with some difficult compromises, even as they continued to try to be heroic. So far in the comic, the clues have been less direct - assuming that's what's being attempted - so it's more a story about reader perception, i.e., if it does turn out that the "heroes" are on the wrong path, then what does that say about me, if I'm defending their actions, because I'm convinced that they're "good" and so must be everything they do? It's a great question to be asking, especially in the current U.S. political climate, but meanwhile I guess it's up for the individual reader to make those calls. Which is kind of a weird place to put the readership in: either you're being set up for a bait-and-switch - the Slayers are really the bad guys, and you've been rooting for them! - or you can become increasingly disturbed and put off the book, which is more where I'm at. It's the sort of story that, I think, works better in graphic novel format, where you can read the whole thing in one go.