Entry tags:
Because sometimes Spike is even more beautiful than usual...
I don't have time to reply to comments (yet), but having skimmed the thread for AOQ's review of 'Lessons' I discovered that there are people who don't think Crazy!Spike is drop dead gorgeous. So I felt compelled to make a poll.
And just in case you've forgotten, here's a manip by
sueworld2003 (I think - if it's not, please correct me!) to remind you...

[Poll #817177]
And just in case you've forgotten, here's a manip by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)

[Poll #817177]
no subject
no subject
no subject
Then again, Joss didn't get the hotness of it either.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Drop dead gorgeous ..ohh yes ! :)
I'm completely in love with that look. I mean , even more than I usually am in front of Spike. ;)
--And I don't have an icon from that scene.:(
no subject
I'll just drool over the manip instead...
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
:-)
no subject
(Uses v. appropritae Andrew icon - heh.)
no subject
It could have been used as an Angel/Angelus thing for Spike. Instead of a name change, we could refer to bleached hair Spike as soulless Spike :P
no subject
Heee! Although I doubt the floppy look would have gone well with the duster... can't have everything I suppose.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2006-09-10 22:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2006-09-11 20:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2006-09-11 20:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Sometimes I despair of humanity...
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I've been meaning to ask you. Did you read most of the Grave discussion? I had to stop reading S6 stuff early this week (coz I couldn't do it a.n.y.m.o.r.e) and only read the 1st 40 posts or so, but if you did, do you remember what AOQ's and OBS' stand was on Spike going for his soul.
Were they in the camp that believed that's what he was going for or the camp that insists he was going to get his chip out and everything's just a retcon?
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Anyway, here's one of AOQ's replies:
> mariposas wrote:
> remove the chip? the chip doesnt work against people with deep cellular tans
> spike could kill buffy anytime he wants
Exactly. I can see why OBS keeps mentioning how easy it is to forget,
but *the chip doesn't work on Buffy*. He can be himself with her, as
he proved in "Seeing Red." Spike frames his choice as being about
Buffy, not just about himself. Only the soul can change the way things
are between them. (Also, he's wanted the chip out for a long time, so
why not face the trials sooner?)
AOQ
He also put down burt beautifully, lets see if I can find it...
Ah yes. Burt had gone off on some bizarre rant about the angry Spike fans and Joss trying to launch Firefly and therefore he ret-conned Spike's story. This was AOQ's reply:
Back when I was new at this, I made the mistake of making an
unsupported blanket statement about writer motivations, and Mike Zeares
responded that "this is the kind of criticism that I don't have time
for." I know where he's coming from. Not only is this pure
speculation based on pretty much nothing, but the "retconned" story is
all there, clunky misdirect and all, starting with "Seeing Red."
AOQ
:)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Plus, that blue shirt with half sleeves? Eeew.
no subject
The blue shirt is an abomination.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
And your icon is beautiful. Is it sharable?
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I love when it happens! ;)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject