Reading more about the incident, I can sort of see how they made the mistake, but if an opinion is more than two hundred pages long, I would think you'd want to read a teeny bit more of it before announcing what it's about.
I've only had time to skim headlines, and presumed that there had to be some kind of reason behind it. But yeah - it's better to be safe than sorry and all that...
It sounds like they read as far as "The mandate is not constitutional under the commerce clause..." and ran to post before bothering to turn the page and read "...but it is constitutional under Congress's power to levy taxes."
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject