elisi: Karen Gillan (I can't even by stradiwhovius)
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2012-02-13 10:28 am
Entry tags:

So... that Mark. I think I've worked it out. :)

(Karen Gillan in my icon is doing a Mark impression...)

First of all, then many thanks go to [livejournal.com profile] gabrielleabelle for suggesting that Mark is so... OTT in his Buffy reviews because he expects angst. Because suddenly he was easy to diagnose. Basically he suffers from pre-Traumatic Joss Syndrome.

His tagline is 'You're Not Prepared', but this actually misleading. I don't mean that he's spoiled, but he is prepared. Here are my approximations of his mindset for various things:

Buffy:
'OH NOES IT'S JOSS AND HE LOVES TO STAB PEOPLE IN THE BACK WHEN THEY FEEL HAPPY! EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE PERPETUAL HEARTBREAK, ANYONE COULD DIE AT ANYTIME! WILL IT BE THIS EPISODE THAT BREAKS ME FOR GOOD? OR THIS ONE? OR THIS ONE? OR...'

Lord of the Rings:
'OMG EVERYTHING IS EPIC AND EVERYTHING IS THE FOUNDATION OF ALL FANTASY THAT COMES AFTER AND HOW SHALL I DEAL???'

Moffat Who:
'EVERYTHING IS GOING TO BE CLEVER AND COMPLICATED OH NOES WHAT-IS-GOING-ON-I-CAN'T-WORK-IT-OUT-HELP!!!!'

Twilight:
'THIS IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE RUBBISH AND TERRIBLE - AAAAAAAH! IT'S EVEN WORSE THAN I THOUGHT! HOW IS THAT EVEN POSSIBLE? AND IT KEEPS GETTING WORSE...'

[identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com 2012-02-13 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
He reacted to Suzanne Collins Hunger Games the same way. Which makes sense, I guess. But there's a tendency to treat novels like tv shows without appreciating the vastly different medium. The novelist is less aware of the audience than the television writer is. Less likely to be influenced.
Particularly during Tolkien's time period. Tolkien being somewhat of a hermit and an academic...tended to be largely oblivious. And in regards to his readers...had no problems with them playing with his characters or reinterpreting them. He disagreed with their interpretations. According to Tolkien Lord of the Rings was not an anti-war series. Nor was he making that point. Nor were the Orcs the Germans - I think he was quite annoyed by that interpretation. It anything I think the main theme of the books was in regards to the effects of the industrial revolution on Europe - the destruction of the primeval forest, the pollution of the air. The changes.

A lot of fiction during that period was about the Industrial Revolution, just as a lot of fiction right now is about the Information/Technological Revolution - with oddly similar themes.

But I think many of those themes fly over Mark's head...because he is somewhat unaware of historical context. Again, I blame the US public educational system for this. The man got a lousy education.

[identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com 2012-02-14 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Which is why he is so strange to read - he utterly fails to grasp everything that I take for granted. Has he even read Narnia? He can't see the metaphors. The trees, for instance...

Well, it does make his commentary stand out, which makes me wonder if this is deliberate? All reviewers, even those who have never seen the series before, write a more detailed review.

Mark's reviews feel a bit like a "performance". As if he is playing a role or persona, and each comment, post, is carefully written in that character or voice that he is portraying. He also does "Mark Does Stuff" with more or less the same emotional language and internet slang. And then there's the "Live Tours" and "Live Blog". Feels very "rehearsed" and "performed".
We all squee over things, we all get excited...but often it will vary.
Our writing voice will vary slightly. His is almost too consistent.

It is like reading a reality show in a way...because reality show performers are somewhat the same way - we're told their emotions and portrayal's are real, but...after a while it becomes apparent that we are watching a "performance" and a well-edited one at that.

[identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com 2012-02-14 05:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Speaking of Mark? Where is he? Shouldn't Monday's episode be up by now?

[identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com 2012-02-14 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Didn't The Wish come before Amends...and wasn't it supposed to watched on Monday? This is so pathetic, I'm clearly jumping over to read his Buffy posts at lunch to amuse myself. ;-)

[identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com 2012-02-14 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
No, you don't understand. I wasn't able to see his reviews of the Wish or Amends until now. For some reason every time I hunted for it - all I got was Lover's Walk.

Two observations?1) This man is a HUGE Cordelia shipper. And a huge Xander/Cordy, Oz/Willow shipper. He did not like their breakup. (He's going to hate Angel S4). Cordy is clearly his favorite character. Also he clearly has major issues with infidelity. Big trigger for him - if he thinks Lover's Walk is the hugest episode ever?? He fell for the mislead that the Wish is a Cordelia centric episode, no. It's a Buffy centric episode - what would life have been like if Buffy never came to Sunnydale.

2) He's deliberately looking at this series through a very immature and somewhat "teen" lense. Possibly, because he is trying to write a YA novel and attempting to find the voice for it and appeal to that young teen male audience. But it rings false, because he is 28 years of age.

[identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com 2012-02-14 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't understand his love of Cordelia...it's so odd. If he was watching Angel? Sure. But Buffy? Cordy barely has a role.

And the over-identification with high school has always puzzled me.
People, I want to say, you do understand that high school is only three to four years out of your entire life? You can forget it. Actually you are going to forget it. Trust me.

(Actually this what I loved about the episode HIM (which everyone in fandom seems to hate, maybe because it did this?) - it really pokes fun at people who can't get past high school. The first five-six episodes of S7 really had fun addressing that.)