elisi: Edwin holding a tiny snowman (S7 love by cleapet (not sharable))
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2010-11-25 02:13 pm
Entry tags:

Always the same 'ship, just with different couples...

I've been re-reading Gaudy Night (like you do), and one sentence suddenly stood out. Well a lot of them did, obviously, because it's a wonderful book, but I've been thinking about how Peter and Harriet are my 'shipping blueprint, and there is was, perfectly:

That, then, was what he wanted her for. For some reason, obscure to herself and probably also to him, she had the power to force him outside his defences.

Because that is it - the thing that runs through every couple I've ever shipped. Buffy/Spike (although there it is him forcing her out of her defences), Jack/Ianto, Doctor/River, and - with a slight variation, in that these couples are also very old - Spike/Angel and Doctor/Master. Heck you can add Cutter/Leetah to that list, and Howl/Sophie - or even Elizabeth/Darcy... (um, not me. The Austen version.)

To quote the book again (it makes more sense in context - there's poetry involved - but I think it works on its own):

He did not want to forget, or to be quiet, or to be spared things, or to stay put. All he wanted was some kind of central stability, and he was apparently ready to take anything that came along, so long as it stimulated him to keep that precarious balance.

It's not about the strength of their [~romantic~] feelings (how *do* you measure love, anyway?), or about making each other happy; indeed a lot of my 'ships have at various points tried to kill each other. But that connection is still there, that ability to force honesty from each other:

"And I can fool Giles, and I can fool my friends, but I can't fool myself. Or Spike, for some reason."

"It's not pretty, but it's real."


I could go on, but I think this speaks for itself pretty well. All thoughts welcome.

([livejournal.com profile] promethia_tenk have you finished it yet? *looks hopeful* My ear is open like a greedy shark to catch the tunings of a voice divine...)

[identity profile] ever-neutral.livejournal.com 2010-11-27 02:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes! Trust me! :D

But yeah, no, you're totally right on that one though. Buffy and Spike... are complicated. Buffy's spent the last several years trying to deny their relationship meaning, because it means too many things. Angel represents a time of certainty; Spike forces her out of her comfort zone. "Does it have to mean something?" It's too complicated to define.

OMG. SPIKE AND ANGEL HAVE A TEDDY BEAR LOVE. :D :D :D

Day complete. (Oh yes, and the other two are quite fitting, too. *g*)

[identity profile] ever-neutral.livejournal.com 2010-11-28 05:43 am (UTC)(link)
Yesssss love the Xander/Anya comparison. Very true. Where do we go from here indeed. (Pretty much one of their catchphrases, no?)

Hee, I am curious about this exact inspiration-striking moment now.

[identity profile] ever-neutral.livejournal.com 2010-11-29 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
Ha, no, I am totally an eternal optimist with my ships. I just don't see the point in being anything else.

Yeah, I have epiphanies about TV shows walking down the street too. *shakes head* What are we.