elisi: Edwin holding a tiny snowman (Spike - canon by st_salieri)
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2010-10-21 01:47 pm
Entry tags:

Spike #1. Review thing.

So, new Spike comic and what do you know? I have meta! :) It’s been a while, so let’s see how I do? *flexes Buffy meta muscles* Oh yeah, like writing a bike! I’m going to do this with lots of subheadings, so people can pick and choose what part they want to read. Although there is some s8 snark scattered throughout. Sorry. I have issues.

Why I like Lynch’s Spike
First of all, then yes, Lynch can be a jerk. Secondly - I don’t care. Lots of writers are jerks. Should he stay away from fandom? You betcha. But hey, that’s his funeral.

Anyway, I’m presuming that there are *other* reasons for people to dislike his Spike. I was thinking about this, and why I think he’s great. Partly it’s because I like Spike, full stop. Like my icon says, I like all the different Spikes - good, evil, loving Buffy or Angel, I adore him. As for Lynch’s specific Spike, then that taps into something that pre-dates the comics. I wrote a post (more a rant really, inspired by various things) a long time ago about Why didn’t Spike go to Buffy? ([livejournal.com profile] avrelia also has a brilliant, and much more measured, post here). My conclusion was that ‘He cares more about being a hero than getting Buffy.’ This is hugely simplified, of course (and made a lot of my fellow Spuffies very sad), but I was fed up of everyone thinking that he was staying away because he thought that Buffy didn’t love him (rather, than, say because he wanted to leave her free to do what she wanted). Although, looking at s8, I can now certainly see the justification of that mindset. s8!Spuffy is reminding me mostly of Martha/Doctor: You know, she likes him, is grateful that he saved the world and all that, trusts him and so on and on, but just doesn’t love him like *that*. (Don’t get me wrong, s8!Spike is lovely. But s8!Buffy is a million miles away from *my* Buffy, and with the glow thing on top I don't feel I have even the most tenuous grasp on her. The banter is spot-on though, and I can see why people enjoy it.)

Anyway, I like Lynch’s Spike because he’s his own man, secure in himself and who and what he is, someone not always trailing after others (Buffy, Angel) but striking out for himself and saving the day, just because he can. Also, he makes friends with people, and if there’s one thing I want Spike to have it’s friends who are all his.

I think Spike loves Buffy and vice versa. I think they’d be very happy together (when they’re not throwing furniture at each other). I also think that Spike loves Angel (and vice versa). I think (ultimately) he stayed with Angel because he knew Angel needed him more [than Buffy did]. They bicker endlessly, whilst always having each other’s back. This is how Lynch writes them, and it’s exactly how I write them too. So yeah, no problems.


Why I think that ‘evolution’ page is awesome
Apparently people don’t like it. It’s one of those cases where I find myself baffled, because it strikes me as so obvious that it’s hard to find the right words to use. So, I figured I’d let the picture itself do the talking, just with a couple of captions added:



We’ve seen this conflict/difference between them since the beginning - the ‘artist’ versus the one who thought it was all just a party. Now they’re all souled up, the dynamic stays - Angel (so often morally compromised by circumstance) is the one who thinks carefully about how and why. See him talking to Jasmine about world peace vs. free will. Angel is the one who had a soul, and then a destiny, forced on him - the one who doesn’t have choice, and because of that thinks about things a lot more carefully - and chooses to fight. Spike OTOH is the one bending the rules, the wild card, the Bad Boy of champions. Notice how he describes Angel - dull, coma-inducing, boring... It’s tearing Angel down even as he builds him up, equating nobility with someone overly politically correct who takes everything (himself included) way too seriously. Spike puts himself in contrast to this - he’s cool, laid-back, easygoing - big damn hero, yes, but not one for the big speeches or over-thinking things.

Let me borrow an example from C.S.Lewis’s ‘The Horse and His Boy’. (Background story: A king has twin sons. One is kidnapped as an infant. After many adventures the day is saved, and the one who was kidnapped - Cor - discovers that because he is the eldest, he - not his brother Corin - will one day become king):

“Oh dear,” said Cor. “I don’t want to at all. And Corin - I am most dreadfully sorry. I never dreamed my turning up was going to chisel you out of your kingdom.”
“Hurrah! Hurrah!” said Corin. “I shan’t have to be King. I shan’t have to be King. I’ll always be a prince. It’s princes have all the fun.”
“And it’s truer than thy brother knows, Cor,” said King Lune. “For this is what it means to be a king: to be the first in every desperate attack and last in every desperate retreat, and when there’s hunger in the land (as must be now and then in bad years) to wear finer clothes and laugh louder over a scantier meal than any man in your land.”


Spike is more than happy to let Angel be King. ‘Cause he is smart enough to know that the princes have all the fun.

(Plus there’s a hundred-plus years of issues between them, with Angel as father-figure, brother, destroyer etc. etc. But I’m not bothering going down that avenue now.)

Thoughts on the issue itself
I’ve heard that there are people who think this issue... slow? Time wasting? Well allow me to disagree:

- We get all of Spike’s story, from siring and right up to the present day.

- We are introduced to the plot (Vegas is full of badness!), and it’s revealed who’s pulling the strings (at least some of them, I’m sure there’s a twist).

- We are introduced to canon characters and see how Spike gets on with them, and meet his new friends (complete with enough background story to fill in anyone unfamiliar with previous instalments).

- We see Spike arrive in Vegas and tackle his first problem, introducing him to the Big Bad.

- Plus, we get a couple of pages worth of Twilight-mockage. (Mocking Twilight is always a good thing in my world!)

Not bad for a first issue. Beginnings are delicate things, and I appreciate that all the background has been filled in. I know where Spike (and everyone else) is at, and that’s pretty helpful when I’m reading a story about him!

Anyway, onto more specific things...

Vegas thing looks fun (and horrible, of course). I wonder how it’ll all end up with a [pan dimensional] steam punk ship.

Background story is brilliantly done. And 'Alone together now' is making me green with writerly envy. Plus, Angelus in the background of Spike’s siring? Oh yeah.

(I’ll deal with the Twilight thing separately.)

Spike/Angel snarky banter! *profound love* And Illyria!!! This exchange made me laugh out loud in delight:

Angel: Illyria, watch the civilians.
Illyria: I am. They’re weeping. It’s repulsive.


Then, the getting-the-band-back-together. OK, so the fact that Beck is now dressed as a girl in a comic book is less than yay worthy, but hey - she *is* a girl in a comic book, and Lynch & Urru make no claims about being feminist in any way. What I *do* like is Spike’s 'I’m on a mission, love. The dark forces are stepping up and I want someone who will have my back. Beck can handle herself in a fight and she takes direction. There’s no romantic intentions here.' Beck’s in the story because she’s a good fighter, and a good friend, and I sincerely doubt she’ll ever be shown as a love interest. *crosses fingers* (She hero-worships Spike rather, but I think she got over that in Shadow Puppets. So I’m optimistic.) Plus, she’s just adorably excited to be in Vegas. ♥

And Betta George! \o/ Everything’s better with him around. Plus, he brings up Connor. LOOK PEOPLE HE EXISTS! (Calling him ‘Teen Angel’ made me smile.) Damn I hope this comic gets the blessing of the PTB and becomes ‘canon’ since that means Angel’s greatest love hasn’t been consigned to the ret-con dustbin.

’Everyone else sees the flying Elvises, er... Elvisii? Elvees?’ *cheers for language joke* (’Is this a Cirque thing?’ Heh.) Also, Spike is smart and figures out what to do immediately. Which leads to the wonderful end panel of him deciding to just lie down for a minute (hey, his shoulder’s out of socket, I’m not blaming him!) - but still trying to maintain his cool. :)

Dru, of course, is a wonderful surprise (and mmmmm, those pages are just luscious!), although who is her beau? He reminds me of the werewolf from Asylum, but that could be coincidence. And why does Spike have his soul? Anyway, I can’t wait to see what happens when Spike and Dru meet again!

All in all - good set-up, nice mystery, and my boy Spike set for lots of heroics! I’m on board and eagerly awaiting next month.


The Twilight Thing
So, here’s the part where I am ALWAYS up for a Twilight joke. It might be stupid, but never as stupid the books themselves. And I rather love the idea of them being written by Spider, rewriting her somewhat one-sided (and problematic) thing with Spike into a Twu Wuv yarn (It's called TWINKLE! This keeps making me chuckle. Told you I was easy...) Plus 'Now there’s a teen wolf thrown into the mix for no apparent reason' is so RIDICULOUSLY accurate that it’s almost painful. (Although if Dru's lover IS a werewolf, then it's v. nice foreshadowing.) To jump sideways then I find s8’s ‘Twilight’ cover with Spike as Jacob far more insulting - because Jacob really is pointless. He’s the guy who has NO CHANCE IN HELL, and is only thrown into the mix to create artificial tension. Thanks Joss, we didn’t need that. (Going further, then does that mean that Spike is destined to fall in love with and marry Queen Twilight?)

Anyway, if we go with the ‘canon’ thing, then both the Twinkle craze and the movie about Angel (and girl!Spike) in Hell-A go much further than anything in s8 to show why vampires have become so popular. Imagine for a minute that the Twi-hards found out that their darling Eddykins was real... they’d totally fight tooth and nail for him and his kind. Plus, with hero!Angel saving LA from the hordes of hell (based on a true story!), the public has plenty of positive role models to project their feelings onto. I’m sure Twilight (the organisation) happily exploited this. (Thank you Mr Lynch for filling in some plot holes - feel like explaining why Buffy lost her mind and started robbing banks? Can't be done? Ah well, it was worth a try.)

Nostalgia and bitterness. s8 lovers should probably stay away - I don’t want to harsh your squee
Reading this issue was actually a bittersweet experience. Because for a few pages I had my show back - it was Illyria and Angel and Spike, fighting and bickering and being so completely themselves that it made me miss my show more than I have for a long, long time. And I remember that they cancelled it, that we could have had more, that we’ll never ever get them back, and it’s painful. My beautiful, beautiful show.

And the thing is - s8 doesn’t inspire those kinds of feelings. At all. Everyone is OOC and badly drawn and the story makes no sense and they destroyed my Angel. Seeing him here - rigidly moral, a little petty, and just... Angel - it suddenly brought home again the *immense* damage done to him in s8. It’s so vast that I can’t really grasp it. And I don’t think I can ever forgive Joss.

So yes, I’m bitter. I didn’t think I had it in me to have any feelings about s8 anymore (my feelings went from bemusement through frustration to disgust and then ended up in mocking indifference) - but apparently I can still be bitter. I wrote Buffy & co. off as a lost cause years ago, but I had hoped that Angel and Spike could stay unsullied. How wrong I was. Spike is still himself (miraculously), but I want him to do his thing and then run far far away from the train wreck again as fast as his undead legs can carry him.

So yeah, I’m clinging to this comic, partly because it's set BEFORE everything goes to hell Twilight. I didn't want to end on such a downer, but... *deep sigh* I think I'll watch some Angel tonight. Maybe 'Damage'. And I'll raise my glass to both my souled vampire Champions.


Oh! I forgot to talk about the 'aerial sex' joke. As people have noted it comes out of nowhere, doesn't fit with anything and is pretty pointless. Much like the aerial sex itself then.

Also RL is actually pretty busy at the moment, plus it's my birthday tomorrow, so I might be a little slow in replying to comments. But I always get there in the end.

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/woman_of_/ 2010-10-21 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)
It hasn't arrived for me yet, but had to read what you said (s8 has disillusioned me so much for the Buffy!Verse in Comic!Land). Good to know Lynch has pulled a rabbit out of a hat. Got his own original characters back (who were, in my opinion, fantastic), given Spike his own group, and the snarky, snippy relationship between Spike/Angel into the mix.

Sounds just perfect. I also love that Lynch has poked fun at Twilight in a way that still make me proud of my show, rather than what has happened in s8, with just makes me cringe in embbaressment.

[identity profile] ever-neutral.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I can add your review to the + pile then. *g*

I think they’d be very happy together (when they’re not throwing furniture at each other).

HA! So true.

I also think that Spike loves Angel (and vice versa). I think (ultimately) he stayed with Angel because he knew Angel needed him more [than Buffy did].

WORD. This is so how I see it too. ♥

Spike is more than happy to let Angel be King. ‘Cause he is smart enough to know that the princes have all the fun.

Oh, TOTALLY. Totally.

because Jacob really is pointless. He’s the guy who has NO CHANCE IN HELL, and is only thrown into the mix to create artificial tension.

Oh, I'd actually argue about this. Jacob is in the mix to represent Bella's only real connection to humanity (aside from Charlie). Because Twilight is failsome, the protagonist instead chose death ("forever") over either Jacob or, you know, independence - and it was portrayed as the right choice.

But ugh. Talking about Twilight makes me cranky.

it was Illyria and Angel and Spike, fighting and bickering and being so completely themselves that it made me miss my show more than I have for a long, long time. And I remember that they cancelled it, that we could have had more, that we’ll never ever get them back, and it’s painful. My beautiful, beautiful show.

*bursts into tears* WHY. WHY DO IT. I will never not mourn the season 6 that never was.

I forgot to talk about the 'aerial sex' joke. As people have noted it comes out of nowhere, doesn't fit with anything and is pretty pointless. Much like the aerial sex itself then.

LOL. I like it when you get your snark on.
shapinglight: (comic book spike with chain)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2010-10-21 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Goes to show how I've been feeling about the whole comics business recently that it's got to the stage now where I actually feel a bit scared to stick my hand up and say I agree with you (mostly. I didn't like the Twilight-mockage, partly because I loathe Spider so much that even seeing Spike refer to her as an ex-girlfriend' makes me feel queasy).

Season 8 Spike is fine as far as he goes, which isn't far since he's arrived on the scene so late, and thinking he's so much better than Lynch's Spike does seem to me to depend on a lot on not liking Angel very much.

I'm a pessimist about Spike's role in the Buffy comic (there's a surprise), and I've yet to see any real sign that Joss considers the character important or has any story to tell about him. At least Lynch wants to write about him.

And you're right. Comparing Spike to Jacob is insulting.

And now I feel like I said too much again. :sigh:

[identity profile] sueworld2003.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 01:36 pm (UTC)(link)
"And now I feel like I said too much again. :sigh:"

Oh don't be silly. Hell are people daft enough to think that free speech only travels one way? *g*

[identity profile] sueworld2003.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 01:39 pm (UTC)(link)
"Everyone is OOC and badly drawn and the story makes no sense and they destroyed my Angel"

"Spike is still himself (miraculously), but I want him to do his thing and then run far far away from the train wreck again as fast as his undead legs can carry him."

Yep, got it in one. Run Spike as fast as you can! :D
lynnenne: (spike comics)

[personal profile] lynnenne 2010-10-21 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Great review. I won't be buying the comics, but if you happen to know of a download I wouldn't say no. ;) I would love to read some Angel/Spike/Illyria banter that actually sounds like them.

I love Lynch's Spike. I loved him in After the Fall, and it sounds like I would love him in this. Of all the comic book writers, I think Lynch writes the Angel characters the best - and that includes all the former BtVS writers working on S8.

And YAY for mention of Connor!

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 02:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I am glad you are enjoying something in the comic world.

I just wanted to say that one of the things I love about season 8 Spike is exactly that he is his own man. It screams through in every panel. He's also reclaimed his William-ness, which is something I've hoped for ever since the poetry slam in NFA, which I thought was a huge moment for him, and which I wanted to see matter in any story about Spike going forward.

The huge divide is Angel and everything to do with him, I think. Season 8 is far too dark on Angel. This is clear even to someone like me who has always wanted people to be more mindful of how very dark Angel is. But IDW is far too light. And at the end of the day, that's the mistake I can't live with. I had an agenda coming out of NFA, and that was that it represented Angel's definitive *fall*. I wanted a story of him dealing with that and recovering from it, not one that just swept it off to the side with Lorne getting his groove back, and Lindsey's execution not being mentioned, or Drogyn, or any of the more subtle but very major darknesses that were part of NFA. I can see that an Angel story going forward that very much shoves all that to the side is more fun. More fun to have a son who miraculously gets his dark memories back and has no emotional repercussions to deal with. More fun all around. But what I love about Angel and AtS is the capital D dark they played with and the epic classic tragedy (where the problem isn't what happens to you, but rather what happens when you fail at your own life project). So this happier version leaves me behind.

Season 8 might leave me behind as well. Angel's dark there is broadbrush cartoon and is not really a meaningful engagement with his story the way I'd want it to be engaged. But if I have to choose cartoons, that's how I list. And I totally understand why others might prefer IDW's cartoon to DH's.

[identity profile] treadingthedark.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Loved your review. I haven't got mine yet, it's been bought for me but not delivered yet, but I am pretty excited about it. I agree with everything you said.
"Oh! I forgot to talk about the 'aerial sex' joke. As people have noted it comes out of nowhere, doesn't fit with anything and is pretty pointless. Much like the aerial sex itself then."
Heh.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 02:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Lol about it all being a dream! (And not impossible given how highlighted dreams have been since the beginning).

I think we are at one on our readings of these, we just gut in different directions about what we want. I totally agree that Angel in s8 is blackwashed beyond recognition (to the point where it's not dealing with the very interesting real darkness the poor guy totes around with him). And I'm glad you love Spike being his own man in season 8.

I did love Asylum. It's the post NFA deal that was the insurmountable breach for me.

[identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I was fed up of everyone thinking that he was staying away because he thought that Buffy didn’t love him (rather, than, say because he wanted to leave her free to do what she wanted). Although, looking at s8, I can now certainly see the justification of that mindset.

Honestly, if someone takes S8 as canon (I won't. I can't.) but if it were canon I don't see where now it can even be a debate whether Spike believed her. It may or may not have been the reason he stayed away, but it's clear that he did not believe her. If he had, he would have been far more surprised by the off-handed way she greeted him. Instead, it was about what he expected. In fact, I'd say if anything s8 has massively reinforced his conclusion that she loves him not at all. Certainly, there have been frenenmies that greeted each other more warmly than Buffy's "don't talk" complete shut-down. I don't see how Spike has anything left to convince himself that he means much to her beyond being a convenient ear and/or crutch. Now, whether that was the cause of his not contacting her, that's open for debate. But with the anti-climactic 'reunion' I don't think there's any reason for Spike to think she loves him at all. Maybe he's wrong, but it would take a shitload of work that the comics aren't going to put into it to convince him. As things stand, I don't see how Spike can think anything other than that Buffy loves Angel more than anything ( a damn site more than him)... and always has. I don't see S8 doing anything to change his mind.

I think (ultimately) he stayed with Angel because he knew Angel needed him more [than Buffy did].
Yes. I think that too. I've always thought that Spike thought that Angel had gotten himself into a pretty dismal situation, but Spike is loyal. And Angel is 'family'. And even if your brother is being a complete idiot, he's your idiot. If his back is against the wall, you'll stand with him (even if you also want to bash his head in). It's a family thing. (And, well, Spike also needs to be needed). Spike and Angel have ties and like brothers they have all the rivalry, old resentments, ties, obligations, hatreds, loyalties, and ambivalence that implies. They aren't best friends. But under the skin they are brothers. At least they are in places other than S8 where Angel is just a brain-dead soulless twat that doesn't even make sense (Seriously, the lack of any thought of Connor thing will always make Season 8 Twangel Angel a joke of a 'characterization.' So sorry, Joss, that Connor was inconvenient to your 'plot', but that's not an excuse to ignore the character's existence or his place in Angel's LIFE! That's just piss poor characterization. Yes. I said it. Joss can fuck-up too. And with S8 Angel he has. In spades.)

the story makes no sense and they destroyed my Angel. Seeing him here - rigidly moral, a little petty, and just... Angel - it suddenly brought home again the *immense* damage done to him in s8. It’s so vast that I can’t really grasp it. And I don’t think I can ever forgive Joss.

See my comments above. For all my issues with the way that Spuffy has been treated, it's nothing compared to my righteous anger of the way that Angel has been completely destroyed. Twangel isn't a character. If he were he'd have relationships (other than Buffy) that would impact his characterization (CONNOR!!!, Spike, even the deaths of Cordy and Wes). Instead he's just a ridiculous plot device. To get all meta about it, Twangel is the personification of the idiot plot. And, yes, that makes me angry. I cannot imagine why Joss chose to treat a character this badly.

Oh! I forgot to talk about the 'aerial sex' joke. As people have noted it comes out of nowhere, doesn't fit with anything and is pretty pointless. Much like the aerial sex itself then.

Space frakking will never, ever cease to be funny! Everyone can joke forever at its expense! It was just so breathtakingly dumb looking and stupid!
Edited 2010-10-21 15:36 (UTC)
ext_15392: (Default)

[identity profile] flake-sake.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Happy Birthday, in case I miss it tomorrow :)

Neat review, I've not read the issue yet and I think I'll wait for the collective volume, what you wrote definitely prompted me to read it.

At first I wanted to skip the series, because I didn't want to read another run that is connected to the trainwreck that is S8, but you're right, it's set before and even if it spends time on trying to make S8 events a little less pointless (everyone loves vamps)hopefully it can be seen as a separate story. It certainly sounds neat.

I'm not totally in love with Lynch's take on things usually. Often I feel it's a bit simple and one dimensional compared to the show, but having just one dimension of the actual show is still miles better than having said show twisted into some pointless parody of itself.

As characterization goes I think Spike having an inferiority complex towards Angel is certainly an aspect of their relationship. It's not the only one and might be one Lynch occasionally dwells on too much, but all in all it works.
I think it's fairly easy to argue that case, Spike IS insecure about Angel, he wants at the same time to be him and to be the complete opposite. Spike's emotions are very conflicted where Angel is concerned, he wants to beat him down, then he wants Angel to be proud of him.
It's a complex relationship and in my mind Lynch only catches parts of it, that's better than nothing though, and certainly a world of better than reducing Angel to the green (glowy) goblin and their relationship to nothing but jealousy over Buffy.

And I agree on the aerial sex joke, it being so misplaced is actually why the joke works so well :).
Edited 2010-10-21 16:59 (UTC)

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Early happy birthday wishes! Big plans with the family? I hope tomorrow's a wonderful day for you! :D



Why I Think The Evolution Page Could've Been Awesome

Take out the "noble" mess, leave Spike thinking he's a chaotic eight and a half, then have Spike snarking that Angel is an astronaut who's evolution has crippled him because he's lost touch with the primal power that fuels this world, that Angel has deluded himself into believing he's evolved into a noble creature.

The problem with that page is that it's framed by Lynch's view that Angel is a straight-up white hat and this improperly forms Spike's POV of Angel. Spike wants to be a caveman, in touch with his primal forces, while Angel wants to be an astronaut. But Spike will look at Angel and see a guy who'll commit atrocities for the greater good and pretend he's somehow less barbaric than the caveman who came before simply because he's wearing gloves so the blood doesn't stain his hands. When Spike looks at Angel, he still sees the barbaric inside him. He always has. So for Spike to entertain the idea that Angel is the noblest of the noble reveals the writer not grasping how dark Angel is as a character and that skews Spike's characterization regarding Angel the same way it would if a writer didn't understand Buffy's darkness when writing BtVS Season 6.

That's what I think is the problem with the evolution page. It implies that this is a straight evolution from barbaric evil to noble good with the barbaric evil of Turokhan at the lowest end and the "noble" goodness of Angel coming out on top. Then you have Spike as a chaotic eight and a half, as if chaos were in conflict with nobility and good, when in fact Spike's special brand of chaos is incredibly good. Spike as chaos figure leads to him helping Buffy save the world in Becoming. Order =! good. Chaos =! evil.

I think that page comes close to being incredibly interesting but then flubs the landing/completely misses the point because of oversimplification. Which is really my problem with Lynch's writing. He comes so close to grasping and expressing the complexity of this 'verse, but then falls short. It's because he so nearly walks the walk and talks the talk that his inability to deliver leaves me so vastly disappointed. Like watching your favorite team nearly score a goal only to miss by an inch. Your hopes are high, your team almost won, but then it's all for naught and what's left to do but jeer and curse 'cause he was so close.

As for the Twilight mockery and the flashback pages, I was hoping for originality. Things I already know like the back of my hand: 1) Spike's life on BtVS and 2) Twilight Sucks. I spent the first half of the issue going Oh Pretteh Pictures About Stuff I Already Know and Jokes That Have Been Told Better For Over Two Years Now.

I hope now that the flashbacks are out of the way, now that Spider has been put to rest, now that the Twilight joke's been done and now that Angel is left behind in LA (so Lynch's oversimplified view of this tragic figure won't muck with the story), all the distractions have been worked out of Lynch's system and he can get back to doing what he does best: Spike. I love Spike: Asylum and Spike: After the Fall. I'd like more of those now.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I was about to give you a volume on my reactions to Lynch and then stopped myself! The short version, Spike: AtF was more like Asylum which I liked a great deal. But it still had the notes on Spike that had always rankled and which by the time we got to Spike: AtF had really soured me on the whole deal. But probably the key thing is that it came after Lorne got his groove back -- and that's the line I won't forgive. Given that Lynch just does see Angel as the model of a souled vampire, I cannot like anything he has to say about Spike. I also really hated that he had Spider forcing sex on Spike while chained and that he refused to acknowledge fan concerns about what that represented. (Imagine having a woman beaten and in chains clearly using sex to stay on the good side of her captor). It's a pity because the rest of that story was good. Spike's relationship with Jeremy; his effort to try to save folks. Though as Deb might remember, the downside of that story was that anti-Spike fans loved the way it reminded us what a thorough-going loser Spike is.

That might also be part of my problem. Anti-Spike fans love Lynch's Spike, for all the reasons that I have a problem with Lynch's Spike. See, e.g., Cheryl's glee at the return of Dru (and the blurb advertising it as the reunion fans have been waiting for).

I don't think season 8 is meant to be read as a straight-forward anything. Whether it's Twilight juice, or the distorting effects of the seed, or a dream -- I think it's all skew and twisted. I just think it's on purpose (on the grounds that while I think Joss is far from perfect, I don't think he swallowed a stupid pill when he decided to write this story). If I'm wrong about that, then I agree with your complaints about season 8 right down the line. I think the twisting is useful for highlighting aspects of the story that are worth airing, but it wouldn't be good if we're supposed to think that sober versions of the characters would act the way they're acting.

[identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Take out the "noble" mess, leave Spike thinking he's a chaotic eight and a half, then have Spike snarking that Angel is an astronaut who's evolution has crippled him because he's lost touch with the primal power that fuels this world, that Angel has deluded himself into believing he's evolved into a noble creature.

Does it need to be that explicit? He said Angel was coma-inducing boring, which is basically that Angel sees the world as simplified, good/bad it must fit in one category or the other...which is somewhat true of Angel.

The thing is, I think, Spike's feelings regarding Angel are complicated. I don't think Spike is all that judgemental of people. He can be cynical about people and he can be incredibly pragmatic on occasions, but one of the things I love about Spike is that he doesn't set himself up as judge. He snarks. He doesn't judge. Angel judges. Angel likes to make moral pronoucements and judgements so as to both reassure himself and to feel entitled. Spike doesn't feel entitled. Spike doesn't feel like he has a soap box to stand on. He'll mock. He likes to mock. But for as angry as Spike is with Angel, as competitive as Spike can be (at times) with Angel, as ridiculous as Spike sometimes feels that Angel is, Spike also has some compassion for him. Spike and Angel share a fair bit of common ground (and loads of history). Spike is aware of Angel's losses (Cordy, Wesley, Fred...). Spike will gladly mock the hell out of Angel, though. That's his pleasure.
Edited 2010-10-21 15:53 (UTC)

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)
So noble it's coma-inducing implies that Angel's type of good is safe and boring when in reality it's anything but safe. Angel's brand of Big Picture good can be just as horrifying when he loses his way. And I think this is portrayal of noble good becomes problematic when it merely reinforces the simplified good Angel that the IDW books continually depict. Just like Maggie says above, in Season 8 Angel is all his bad traits while in IDW's books he's all his good traits and not even a memory of the evil.

So yeah, I think it does need to be stated explicitly because there's no evidence to support the more complex nature of Angel's character in the comics.

The thing is, I think, Spike's feelings regarding Angel are complicated. I don't think Spike is all that judgemental of people. He can be cynical about people and he can be incredibly pragmatic on occasions, but one of the things I love about Spike is that he doesn't set himself up as judge. He snarks. He doesn't judge. Angel judges. Angel likes to make moral pronoucements and judgements so as to both reassure himself and to feel entitled. Spike doesn't feel entitled. Spike doesn't feel like he has a soap box to stand on. He'll mock. He likes to mock. But for as angry as Spike is with Angel, as competitive as Spike can be (at times) with Angel, as ridiculous as Spike sometimes feels that Angel is, Spike also has some compassion for him. Spike and Angel share a fair bit of common ground (and loads of history). Spike is aware of Angel's losses (Cordy, Wesley, Fred...). Spike will gladly mock the hell out of Angel, though. That's his pleasure.

I think Spike judges in the sense that he perceives who Angel really is. The distinction I'd draw between the two is that both Spike and Angel judge others for their faults, but it's Angel who condemns.
Edited 2010-10-21 16:01 (UTC)

[identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 04:08 pm (UTC)(link)
But that's asking Spike to pass a summary judgement on Angel, and I don't think we often do that with people in our lives. Nor do I think Spike is predisposed to make summary judgements on people. He snarks about them, and on a personality level, I think he has a pretty good read that Angel is someone who insists on things being black and white. Angel is not comfortable with ambiguities. That's not where Angel lives. When he's in 'good' mode, he's a morality judge. 'Things should be this way. And I'll decide.' Being a moral 10 isn't a great thing. It pretty much is morality police asshattery, which Angel can slip into often. When Angel is in 'good' mode, he goes into ethical police mode. He sets himself as arbiter of what is good and what is not. So Spike pokes fun at that 'morality'.

Spike isn't going to do a dissertation on whether Angel is flawed. He knows Angel is an asshat. He knows Angel can go evil. He also knows that Angel likes to make it black and white. Either Angel is trying to be a 10 or a -2. There's really never a time when Angel tries to be in-between. And at this particular stage of the game, Angel is in his judgey 10 mode.


I think it's just perhaps a different way of looking at things. I don't think Spike carries the past with him all the time, so he isn't retroactively examining Angel's mistakes now or projecting what Angel will do in the future. He just knows that when Angel is in 10 mode he can be a prig.

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-10-21 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
But that's asking Spike to pass a summary judgement on Angel

If Spike doesn't pass a summary judgment on anyone, then the entire evolutionary chart is out of character for Spike.

Being a moral 10 is a good thing though. That's what doesn't make sense. Mother Theresa or Gandhi = moral 10's. Angel? Doesn't even come close. Actually being a moral 10 might be so noble it's coma inducing because I can imagine Spike looking at Gandhi and thinking "god your life is boring and I'm so glad I'm not you."

But Angel? There's no way I think Spike has confused Angel with Gandhi.

Simply put, Angel when he's being high on his moral horse isn't boring and coma-inducing--it's annoying and aggravating and makes Spike want to hit things, namely Angel.

I don't read "so noble it's coma-inducing" as Spike saying 'Angel is a judgy wudgy bear who spoils my fun'. Saying Angel's that noble doesn't equate to Angel's an asshat, imo.

He just knows that when Angel is in 10 mode he can be a prig.

Sure, Angel can be a prig. I don't think Spike ever mistakes that for Angel actually being noble, though. I think Spike always sees through Angel and knows that even in his most asshat moments, Angel's trying to run from his evil self and overdoing it by trying to be ubermoral and judgmental. Spike wouldn't call Angel noble because he always sees the selfish and human motives behind what Angel does--how Angel can't stand to look at Spike because he sees the monster in himself.

I think Spike is too good at words to actually think Angel being a judgmental prig = moral. Tara is a moral 10. Angel's just a prig who lords it over people like he's a moral 10, but in the act of lording it over others, he reveals how he's not worthy of the title because truly noble people don't act that way. I think Spike's too perceptive to misjudge both the meaning of nobility and how it applies to Angel's character.
Edited 2010-10-21 16:20 (UTC)

Page 1 of 3