elisi: Edwin and Charles (Spike DD by ruuger (NOT sharable!))
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2017-08-27 09:20 am

I'll say it anyway. Winifred Burkle. Go.

Serendipity is a funny thing...

This whole Joss mess has come along exactly as I decided to finally delve back into the AtS 'verse and finish a WIP I abandoned years ago. (As it happens, it's the only fic I've ever properly planned out, so I found my extensive notes and actually know where the story is going!)

Now, before beginning to write I figured I should probably watch a few episodes, just to make sure I had their voices right in my head; so I watched A Hole in the World and Shells. And it's a fascinating exercise in doublethink (doubleview?).

Like, I love the 'verse. I love the characters. I love the story. I will always be grateful to Joss & co for creating this world.

But there is also the fact that (the very very special) Fred has SIX men standing around her bedside. All of them going to go out and try to SAVE her. (See subject line...)

As you know, the only other women (still standing) in the extended cast are Harmony (who is delightful, but mostly comic relief) and Eve, who is very powerful yet lost all agency the second she lost her boyfriend. ETA: Oh and there's Nina too. I like Nina. It's sad her role never extends beyond Being The Girlfriend.

The interesting thing is that the same week my girls decided to watch [the new movie version of] Les Mis.

And it was exactly the same thing:

- Men make things happen.

- Women have things happen to them.

This is why Buffy (and Wonder Woman, Rey, et al) are so special. They make things happen.

(Possibly more musings later, but this is a pretty well-trodden path, and I'm preaching to the choir...)


Also I'm realising this is probably a pretty awful way to try to get people to read my 'Spike & Angel & Illyria go on an epic quest to undo the power of W&H' story, as it's rather male-centric. AH WELL. It's not like LJ is teeming with people reading AtS fic anymore. Although I should probably point out that there's a good deal of Buffy & her Slayer army in it too...

For those who want to try (and the lovely handful which read the first few chapters back in 2013 when I started posting and might want to have another look), you can find the fic here (well, the first 7 chapters):

Divided Destiny

More chapters coming soon! :D (*crickets*)
promethia_tenk: (Default)

[personal profile] promethia_tenk 2017-08-27 10:28 am (UTC)(link)
Oh AtS . . . you had some greatness about you, but truly some of the most appalling treatment of women I've ever seen on tv.
orangerful: (Default)

[personal profile] orangerful 2017-08-27 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Just because it is "male-centric" doesn't mean there is anything wrong with it. Now, if you posted "I am only writing male centric stories because men are better' THEN that would be wrong. You just connected with a story you wanted to tell and told it.

It's sad that so many writers do have to make that conscious effort and then have to make the effort to write female characters that take action as much as men. :\
greensword: (Default)

[personal profile] greensword 2017-08-27 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
When I think about how good the gender politics of a show are likely to be before watching it, I usually ask a set of questions something like:

- Is the main character a woman?
- Is the main relationship or one of the main relationships between two women?
- Do women make up more than 50% of the characters?

The answer to all of the questions doesn't have to be yes but if none of them are I tend to skip it. This is based in part on shows like Angel. I found Angel especially disappointing not because it was especially terrible - I mean yes, it was full of sexist tropes, but a lot of shows are, and it had good parts too - but because it spun out of Buffy which was its opposite in so many ways. To the extent that A Hole in the World has a BtVS equivalent it's probably Tara's death in Seeing Red and while it was fucked up in its own way (stop killing queer characters!) there was so much more to the characters' responses, they were so differentiated, like I still get chills thinking about how Dawn sat with Tara's body for hours because she didn't want her to be alone. And Willow sought vengeance and Buffy sought justice and Xander felt helpless and Anya put aside her own anger and alienation to come help them and I don't know, there's just a richness to it that Angel always seemed to lack.

I also found it telling that the Illyria plot twist was written to showcase Amy Acker's range. Like, maybe try writing a bigger range of emotions and behavior for your female characters rather than having them killed and their bodies possessed by entirely different characters.

Anyway, I'll stop using your post as an excuse to rag on Angel. ;)
jerusha: (Default)

[personal profile] jerusha 2017-08-28 04:35 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, god. Fred...

What killed me about that whole storyline is that they didn't just kill Fred, they literally destroyed her soul. FOR MAN PAIN. I loved Buffy and Angel, I really did, but S5 of Ats was just incredibly problematic in how it dealt with the female characters.
punch_kicker15: (Fred)

Here from the Sunnydale Herald

[personal profile] punch_kicker15 2017-08-29 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
But there is also the fact that (the very very special) Fred has SIX men standing around her bedside. All of them going to go out and try to SAVE her.

Ha, I had exactly the same thought when I rewatched those episodes as background for a fic I wrote a few years ago (it was an AU with the focus on a couple of women saving Fred, so I can't say that I did much better by Fred than canon did, at least in that story.) I realized that's why Buffy (the show) resonates so much more with me than Angel (the show).
debris4spike: (Buffy - with sword)

[personal profile] debris4spike 2017-08-27 02:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Great thoughts.

I really must get back to a couple of WIPs I have (from BtVS) ... so hopefully this will help inspire me.
sea_thoughts: Ruby in *The Legend of Ruby Sunday* (Bookworm - smercy)

[personal profile] sea_thoughts 2017-08-27 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean, you do have a point about Les Mis but a lot of Fantine's problems come from her striving to look after Cosette without actually letting people know about Cosette's existence. She sells all her hair and her teeth for her daughter and then her body. It's only when she's completely broken down physically that Valjean appears and he can't do much more than make her comfortable in her final days.

Eponine also spends much of her story working hard and striving (even if most of it is to make Marius notice her). Even Cosette (in the book) tries to find out more about the world but she's constrained the most by her upbringing.
kathyh: (Kathyh Buffy slayer)

[personal profile] kathyh 2017-08-27 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow! Divided Destiny. That takes me back :)

I can't say I'm very surprised by "the Joss mess". I still love BtVS and AtS but I went off his work in a very big way with Dollhouse which I found very disturbing, but probably not in the ways that he meant me to. Possibly if he hadn't been quite so voluble about his feminist credentials people wouldn't be quite so down on him now, but the hypocrisy leaves a nasty taste.
double_dutchess: (Spillyria)

[personal profile] double_dutchess 2017-08-27 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I want to read it!

[identity profile] garnigal.livejournal.com 2017-08-28 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)
I certainly don't disagree that female characters are often happened to, and in the best cases can be interesting in spite of that. Even Buffy had Slayerhood thrust upon her, rather than taking up the mantle by choice. That said, Buffy the Vampire Slayer was Buffy's show, so she'd damn well better be a driving reason for action. Angel was about Angel, with Fred as a character in orbit around him as the driving force. I'm certainly not saying the character wasn't treated poorly, and I'm not saying that a lot of shows are problematic once you step away from the immediate "hell yeah" of the moment, but subordinate characters must remain subordinate... otherwise they get a spin off. :)

I think the difference between being a fully rounded character in someone else's show versus being the focus of the show is why so many fan boys complain that we have Buffy, and Faith, and Veronica Mars and etc etc etc, why do we need Ghostbusters and Wonder Woman too? And it's because so many of the great female characters that we are inspired by are still driven by a male force.

That got weird and rambly... I'm not sure if there's any nuggets worth discussing in there.
liliaeth: (Default)

[personal profile] liliaeth 2017-08-28 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know if you watch Lucifer, but if you want to watch a show where the female characters have an active role in the plot, rather than just having things happen to them, that's one of the best current examples of such a show.

Well that and Wynona Earp, though imo Lucifer is better written.

From Chloe Decker, who is the one pulling Lucifer into her investigations, to Mazikeen, and Linda who aren't just there to call Lucifer out on his crap, but they get things done in their own way.

Even Chloe's daughter Trixie gets her own plots, and isn't there just to be cute, even though she gets a lot of that as well. And that's not even starting on Charlotte and Ella who join the cast in s2.

The fun part is that all these characters have a diverse function, role and personality on the show. None of them are locked in one role that's all they're supposed to be.

In fact, Lucifer is in many ways comparable to the best parts of Buffy. And though Lucifer is clearly the main character, the cast surrounding him is so strong, and is given their own storylines, to the point that you're not stuck in his pov, making the world far better developed than it might be otherwise.