Just wondering.
These last few weeks lots of people wrote to Scott Allie (and awesome letters they were too), so I was wondering - has anyone written to him about #34 and told him that now we're caught between going 'wtf?' ('cause NONE of it makes sense) and laughing our heads off, because the 'porn' is fugly as hell and so tame it could probably go on ff.net?
ETA: Oh - and how is Joss reconciling this 'canon' thing he keeps talking about with the very clear re-boot he's performed? If you're going to change the whole mythology, at least be upfront about it. Or maybe he conveniently *forgot* seven years worth of continuity... Wouldn't put it past him to be honest.
Not sure why I'm writing this. Mostly I think that this whole sorry affair should be renamed The Emperor's New Clothes. Except clearly 'Tee-hee, look they're naked' is what they're now going for... Hm. A better name would probably be 'Buffy: The Porn Star Years'. 'Cause nothing says female empowerment like taking off your clothes! (The more I think about it, the more it bothers me. Of course the art is too ugly for words, but the objectification is deeply unpleasant. I don't care that it might be 'subversive' - it's still *there*. Also, I love my mood theme. Go Ianto!)
Re. why Joss is writing this, then
paratti has the best theory so far.
ETA: Oh - and how is Joss reconciling this 'canon' thing he keeps talking about with the very clear re-boot he's performed? If you're going to change the whole mythology, at least be upfront about it. Or maybe he conveniently *forgot* seven years worth of continuity... Wouldn't put it past him to be honest.
Not sure why I'm writing this. Mostly I think that this whole sorry affair should be renamed The Emperor's New Clothes. Except clearly 'Tee-hee, look they're naked' is what they're now going for... Hm. A better name would probably be 'Buffy: The Porn Star Years'. 'Cause nothing says female empowerment like taking off your clothes! (The more I think about it, the more it bothers me. Of course the art is too ugly for words, but the objectification is deeply unpleasant. I don't care that it might be 'subversive' - it's still *there*. Also, I love my mood theme. Go Ianto!)
Re. why Joss is writing this, then

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Then the snark would begin. Desexed Barbie and Ken Do The Kama Sutra-- Now With More Universe Retconning Exposition!
no subject
no subject
Dear DH: We appreciate the crumb! (Especially since the crumb appears fairly untainted by the crack...)
Then the snark would begin. Desexed Barbie and Ken Do The Kama Sutra-- Now With More Universe Retconning Exposition!
LOL! :D
no subject
And now, I've spent way too much time trying to parse Meltzer's statement of intent in a recent interview:
I actually wanted it to be more than just titillating crap. I wanted to be sexy and beautiful. And one of the best compliments we've gotten by e-mails and all over the place was where people said they went to read it again in a dark room. There's something immensely disturbing about that, but full credit again to Georges for getting to that moment where we're trying to turn people on. That wasn't the full goal or what we set out to do, but if you're going to do this and tackle it in this way, you better at least do that.
O_O There is so much double-speak in there, that my head may explode. And yes, it angers me. But at this point, unless you are vitriolic, the answer is always going to be "wait for the next issue" or "wait for Joss to explain it all", and if you do not ascribe to the church of Joss (irony intended), you'll not be taken seriously. And if you are vitriolic, you'll not be taken seriously. And if you let any 'shipper sensibility leak through, you'll not be taken seriously. There has to be a way, but I don't see it right now.
no subject
O_O indeed. I'm kinda speechless to be honest. Mostly because it's just creepy and distrubing (and partly that THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO FIND IT HOT?????) - but mostly just... ew.
(Did you watch this clip that I posted yesterday? That's how to do it!)
There has to be a way, but I don't see it right now.
Calling Buffy a porn star and telling him that it's made all of LJ shake with laughter?
no subject
I don't care that it might be 'subversive'
I wouldn't even call it subversive. It's just PWP with pictures of rather mundane looking sex written by geekboys with a built-in out so they don't have to go anywhere with it. It's the type of thing you used to mistakenly read on fanfiction.net. And on top of all that, sex is still made to be a bad thing (unless it's with writer stand-ins like Riley or Xan).
And it makes me want to defend Angel which is just unforgivable.
It's just further denigration of the characters and series. Which is the whole point right now, I think. I can't think of any other reason why. If they wanted sex, sex and more sex, they had sort of implied at the end of AtS. Why not go with that? That could have been subversive and at least made sense. Nor would have the obvious high school loser revenge fantasy on the pretty girl vibe that permeates the comics.
no subject
Bwahahahah.
no subject
Well *they* will call it subversive, I'm sure, if anyone tries to call them on their PWP.
It's the type of thing you used to mistakenly read on fanfiction.net.
Heh. This is very true! :)
It's just further denigration of the characters and series. Which is the whole point right now, I think. I can't think of any other reason why.
I think
no subject
I think [info]paratti has the right idea (see my post, I edited it) - but it's still a cheap sellout.
I read that and I agree with it. But it explains his motive for making them comics to start, but the whole crapping all over the continuity and characters? I don't know. I can't think of any motive outside of resentment and bitterness.
no subject
He's on drugs?
no subject
I'd have to write it for myself, without any hope of having an effect. I might, still.
And, in case you're wondering, I'm definitely on the "not sexy" bandwagon. Your example was much better in this regard.
no subject
Oh yes, I got that. It's just that I can't believe that they actually think it's well done. My mind is boggling.
I'd have to write it for myself, without any hope of having an effect. I might, still.
Good luck! Personally I'd be snarky as hell, and I don't think that would work at all...
no subject
You can't blame drugs, elisi. :) Some of the best songs, scripts and novels were made with the writers stoned out of their melons. :P
no subject
"And one of the best compliments we've gotten by e-mails and all over the place was where people said they went to read it again in a dark room."
I want to know how he thinks that if you're in a dark room, you can read it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Or maybe he's clean now. He was all tripped out for the TV show and this is sober!Joss we're getting.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=25656
(That's about three-quarters down the page, under the picture of GiantForeheadGiles and a bat with glowing red zombie eyeballs.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
...Oh, dear, I hope Dark Horse doesn't decide to publish special Scratch 'n Sniff collector editions.
no subject
Maybe they;re going in for a healthier diet. Less cholesterol. :-P
no subject
no subject
no subject
:):)
no subject
no subject
A very clever policy indeed. I started out reading out of curiosity, and now just mock from afar... every time I think it can't get any worse, it does!
no subject
no subject
Insects: The Other White Meat.