Entry tags:
End of an era... in two years time.
From the Radio Times:
Doctor Who showrunner Steven Moffat quits to be replaced by Broadchurch creator Chris Chibnall
Only a Doctor Who Christmas special will air in 2016. Moffat's final series to be broadcast next year in order to create a “huge event” for fans. Chibnall will begin his tenure in 2018
And this seems quite fitting.
Doctor Who showrunner Steven Moffat quits to be replaced by Broadchurch creator Chris Chibnall
Only a Doctor Who Christmas special will air in 2016. Moffat's final series to be broadcast next year in order to create a “huge event” for fans. Chibnall will begin his tenure in 2018
And this seems quite fitting.

no subject
I remember. :(
So yep, it's all about spacing ...
Interestingly, then I think the fact that Moffat is married with children means that he has to pace himself more than f.ex. RTD. Not that RTD doesn't have a partner, but RTD would spend large chunks of the year alone in Cardiff.
no subject
Being without a family is hard work -- you have to do EVERYTHING yourself.
no subject
no subject
Anyhow, if she's producing Sherlock - it sounds like she's supporting him, right? I mean they work together? That's my brother and his wife's relationship, they work together, and each take turns taking care of the kids. They aren't doing it alone.
Whedon was horrid at pacing and had a family and support just like Moffat.
But Shondra Rhimes? Single Mom and she's running three television series - all at the top of the ratings in the US, and one in it's 12th season.
I don't think we can generalize. Some individuals are just better at juggling or multi-tasking than others. Also it may have a lot to do with the subject matter - Doctor Who unlike other television series is incredibly limiting from a writer's perspective - you have two characters, the Doctor and the companion, a set mythology, and a rabid fandom? It's easier I think, for a writer, to sustain if you have a large ensemble and not one lead. I remember Whedon stating that at one point in an interview. And I've noticed the US shows that have lasted a long time have ensemble casts. Although there are the procedurals with a similar set-up to Doctor Who that go on forever. I tend to lose interest in them after about two or three years -- because I'm more character than plot oriented, and they tend to not change much in regards to character. But they are very popular, so mileage varies.
no subject
How odd! The lateness of my reply is only due to life, and not to any fault on LJs part though. :)
But Shondra Rhimes? Single Mom and she's running three television series - all at the top of the ratings in the US, and one in it's 12th season.
Ah, but she's a woman! *g*
Doctor Who unlike other television series is incredibly limiting from a writer's perspective - you have two characters, the Doctor and the companion, a set mythology, and a rabid fandom?
I'm slightly puzzled by this comment. I'd say it's the *least* limited. You can go anywhere, anywhen, do anything. Add any extras you want, tell any story that's interesting enough? Western, bank heist, murder mystery, the list is endless. Plus, Doctor Who doesn't have a canon. Oh, rabid fans SAY it has, but the show runners don't take a blind bit of notice. ;) And of course, the cast changes regularly.
ETA: Darn, accidentally pressed 'post':
But they are very popular, so mileage varies.
Well, it's like soaps, I suppose. People like serialised story telling. And with stuff like NCIS you can keep it going forever...