elisi: by frimfram (Spuffy - destroyer of worlds! by frimfra)
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2006-08-26 01:25 pm

Spuffy has ruined me...

Or rather - it has crystallised something about what sort of relationships I enjoy reading (and watching). I'm currently working my way through 'The Girl in a Swing' (one of my mother's favourite books), and I'm getting increasingly frustrated. Partly because it's one of those books that begins with the ending (the girl has left/died/disappeared/? - read the book to find out what happens) and the main character is all bereft. Being about 1/3 through he's just met the girl (and proposed) and they're both deliriously, blissfully happy. Basically it's B/A all over. And pondering why it bothers me so (currently I'm thinking he'd have been better off never meeting her, and I'm sure that can't have been the intention), I've realised something:

I like couples where the problems are inherent in the characters, in their temperaments and interactions. To quote 'Elfquest': Differences create good sparks. If they can make it work in spite of - and because of - who they are, then I love it. The action is all in the interplay, and outside forces might have an impact, but it doesn't *shape* the relationship. They are interesting, even if everything around them is dull.

See the problem I have with this book - and with B/A I guess - is that it's outside forces that determine how the relationship fares. There's lots of love, giant big heaps of it, but that's not very interesting. People who are in love are desperately dull to anyone else. So you need to have outside forces to batter the couple - war, or family, or deep, dark secrets, or one of them turns out to be a vampire... And this is when you get the OTT drama, the soul destroying angst when the lovers are parted - because love is (in a way) the only thing keeping them together. The relationship evolves out of their love, rather than the other way around. That's the difference. And I'm not sure that the relationship ever does evolve much. As [livejournal.com profile] the_royal_anna once put it so perfectly:

When I think of Buffy and Angel, they are always standing opposite one another, face-to-face. They are looking only at each other, caught in the moment, still, timeless, static.

When I think of Buffy and Spike, most often they are side by side. I think of the back doorstep in Fool For Love, in Flooded, the moment he sits down beside her in Touched, the night he holds her while she lies awake in Chosen.

That says it all for me.


~~~~~~

We'll be going home on monday, so hopefully I'll be a bit more interactive soon. Please comment, I promise to reply (sooner or later...).

[identity profile] lusciousxander.livejournal.com 2006-08-26 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not a Bangel or a Spuffy, still can't watch their 'love' scenes on screen because they're too long and tend to get boring, but fanfic!wise I rather read a Spuffy fic over a Bangel one. Spuffy had something Bangel didn't have: Friendship. I've always loved the friendship sense in the show more than the love ships, that's why the High School Years and also S4 will have a special place in my heart because of the friendship and family themes.

Yet, I enjoy reading late seasons fics because some usually try to fix and work on the damaged friendship between the core four, Spike gets to interact with someone other than Buffy...

Sorry, I lost track in my friendshippy post. *blush* what I'm trying to say is, during the Spuffy years, things were more complecated, which makes fanfic more intersting. Also the relationship between Spike and Buffy had been through many turns and twists the Buffy/Angel relationship didn't go through. Buffy and Angel suddenly decided they're attracted to each other, but Buffy took time to realize that she cared about Spike and eventually loved him. Spike's struggle to be good for her. All more intresting turns than the Angel/Buffy relationship had.