elisi: Living in interesting times is not worth it (Your Touch by detoxcoctails)
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2006-07-13 05:46 pm

Intervention.

AOQ didn't like 'Intervention'. He doesn't seem to 'get' Jane Espenson, which is a great shame, and his loss. The good thing though, is that One Bit Shy outdid himself again. I'm just copying the whole thing - lots of good points about the ep. and Spike in particular! (AOQ quotes in italics.) (Oh and I *will* get back to comments at some point...)


BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER
> Season Five, Episode 18: "Intervention"
> I think one of the stages one has to go through to be a true devotee of
> this (or any) series is to start getting to know which writers you're
> most and least compatible with...
> ...So I think I may have to turn my antipathy on Jane
> Espenson.


It's ok AOQ. You don't have to create a special Espenson theory to hide it.
We already know you don't have a sense of humor. Don't run from it.
Embrace it. Announce to the world that you laugh in the face of their
pitiful humor!.... Wait. That doesn't quite work, does it? OK. Blame
Espenson then.

"Intervention," the fourth episode by my count (not including
> "Pangs") to feature something that looks like one of the main
> characters masquerading as him/her, contains things that're energetic
> or funny, but at the expense of holding together. I'll give my big
> examplar in a second, but first of all, yes, I'm going to complain
> that Buffy's friends should've figured out what was going on. One
> of the dangers of handing the audience lots of background knowledge
> that the characters have to figure out for themselves is that unless
> it's written well, the heroes can easily seem thick-headed. They do
> here. We never get an answer to "you guys couldn't tell me apart
> from a robot?!" and we deserve one.


Maybe they think Buffy's been doing a real good imitation of a robot lately.
The Buffybot should be offended - but, no, she's too nice for that.

Robo-Buffy's behavior isn't
> just weird, it's very obviously mechanical in a way that the gang
> should have on their minds, having recently dealt with a robot. The
> crew do notice her acting strangely-in-some-way, but it seems to take
> longer that it did in "When She Was Bad." And yet Buffy pegs the
> imposter as a robot seconds after entering. Does not compute. So as
> entertaining as Xander's getting the image of her with Spike,
> "Guy-les," and so on are, they don't go down easy.


From this kind of continuity perspective, the thing I noticed more than the
robot was Xander's blase reaction to Spike showing up in the cemetary to
begin with. Xander's never been a Spike fan, and his attitude towards him
and the flowers for Joyce last episode was decidedly unfriendly. This is
the only glitch of that sort that actually bothers me this episode, because
I think it matters for something that happens later.

I don't care about recognizing that it's a robot though. The setup is made
clear the first time the Buffybot talks to Xander and Anya. And the series
has always been willing to go blind in the service of humor. Just think of
the innumerable times characters have stammered their way through made up
stories without being the slightest bit convincing - yet still getting away
with it. *shrug* It's part of the series, and not important enough to get
in the way of the jokes.

So, my example of a quote as a microcosm for what bothers me the most
> about this show? "Angel's lame. His hair grows straight up, and
> he's bloody stupid." That's quite a funny line, especially with
> the matter-of-fact delivery.


Yes it is.

It should also, by all rights, be either
> a dead bloody giveaway or at least a step in the direction of putting
> things together. I don't accept that Willow wouldn't pick up on at
> least some of the significance.


Or it could be just about the single most unexpected thing Buffy could say
and leaves Willow flabbergasted. I mean her head is already spinning about
sex with Spike - lots of times - lots of different ways. And the suggestion
of drawing diagrams...Yeee! How much can poor Willow digest in one
conversation?

Anyway, I think Willow really was starting on the path of figuring stuff out
when they got interrupted by even bigger and more alarming news.

On an unrelated note, that brings up
> all sorts of other questions (that aren't really especially
> important) about the implication that Spike was the one who made all
> the decisions about which particular "facts" Robo-Buffy would know.
> Why bother to include the drive to Slay and do other non-Spike-focused
> things?


Good lord! What good is a Buffybot that doesn't slay? Spike's no layabout
puffter. He wants to go on the hunt with his hunny and mix the sex in with
a few good stakings. Live (un)life large.

The slaying part is, for me, the absolutely best thing about the Buffybot.
Initiatlly I was a little uncertain. Lines like, "I can't resist the
sinister attraction of your cold and muscular body," are pretty funny. But
it was all still boiling down to just a sexbot, and getting repetitious
mighty fast. But when she put on her jacket (by her own volition) and
announced, "Time to slay," my interest definitely perked up. And then,
"Vampires of the world, beware," spoken as she strides out. Oh, that
Buffybot slayer stride. It's fantastic. To me that was the really defining
character trait of the Buffybot. (SMG does some nice work with the
Buffybot - and in the contrasting scenes with real Buffy.) After that, I
was totally hooked by it.

I also liked how her programming that persistently calls Spike evil
backfires so that she accepts the real Buffy's need to kill him. "You're
right. He's evil. But you should see him naked. I mean really."

The real Buffy is conveniently absent while her imposter wreaks havoc
> and such. I like the weighty feel to the opening scene, in which
> she's reached the point of dulling her pain by "getting into a
> routine." Buffy trying to make sure everyone knows they're loved
> is a little bit raw and uncomfortable, in a good way. Giles's
> tentative but increasingly persistent attempts to get her back to
> training play well, as does his concerned acceptance of the idea that
> she might want to retire.


There's some nice theme work here, both for the season and the series. The
very first theme of the series was resistance to the slayer calling taking
control of Buffy's life. Now it's being applied in a new way. Being slayer
isn't just interfering with Buffy's freedom, it's getting in the way of real
responsibilities that contend in importance with her calling. The old
deciding factor - how much the innocents in the world need her aid - doesn't
weigh in so strongly when put up against taking care of Dawn. Of course,
the two coincide a lot right now. But it's still a powerful element to add
to the ongoing tension between Buffy's life and her job.

I think it's also very interesting that Buffy's examination of what being
Slayer is doing to her - her fear that it's hardening herself inside - is
first manifested by resisting going back to the training and studies with
Giles. Because it's really the same thing that drove Buffy to start up that
training and studying. You may recall that she was going out every night
then - not patrolling, but rather hunting. Buffy was really struck by
Dracula's description of it - and that he saw something dark in it. Buffy
was feeling it then and needed to understand. Of course that eventually led
to her frantic search into the cause of slayer deaths and Spike's awful
claim that death was her art and that deep inside she sought death herself.

One might conclude that what she learned from those studies was that being a
slayer was sapping her ability to love and that she needed to get away from
it. But Giles gets Buffy to look for answers elsewhere, and so Buffy gets
instead a Spike like message that she's filled with love, but love is pain
and death is her gift. All of these things are linked - from Dracula to the
spirt guide's message. Part of the same exploration into herself.

That leads into a bit of a mystical quest,
> with the wide pans across the desert and the musical score setting the
> kind of mood we don't often see on the show. With the Hokey Pokey
> thrown in, and seeming even funnier than it would've been otherwise.


Isn't that a stitch? I love how self conscious Giles is jumping out and
into the circle. Another line I like is, "Buffy, please. It takes more than
a week to bleach bones."

The advice that our hero gets seems to embrace love, which I hadn't
> expected based on "Restless." With a caveat about love leading to
> the Gift Of Death, though. I'm sure it'll at least kinda make
> sense someday. Once the First Slayer started talking, I was afraid the
> show might have gone a little overboard with the mumbo-jumbo factor...
> until Buffy's perfectly timed "what?" Now that's funny.
> Nicely handled mini-plot overall.


It's not really the First Slayer, which is probably why it doesn't match
well with Restless. It's something calling herself the guide using the
First Slayer's form. What exactly the guide is, I don't know. Once could
imagine a number of things.

I do like Buffy's, "What?" quite a bit, as I do her later sneering repeat
of, "Death is my gift", when she meets back up with the Scoobies. Ambiguous
would be a mild description of what was said to Buffy. Not exactly helping
her at the moment. But the words do deserve some thought.

First Slayer: You are full of love. You love with all of your soul. It's
brighter than the fire ... blinding. That's why you pull away from it.
Buffy: I'm full of love? I'm not losing it?
First Slayer: Only if you reject it. Love is pain, and the Slayer forges
strength from pain. Love ... give ... forgive. Risk the pain. It is your
nature. Love will bring you to your gift.
...
First Slayer: Death is your gift.

There are probably more opinions on what that all means than there are
people in this newsgroup, but it still bears thought.

Glory's torturing Spoik isn't a huge standout sequence for me one
> way or the other, but "good plan, Spike" is nice. And the fight at
> the end has some energy.


I think maybe if you had gotten a little more engaged in Spike's torture
scene, his behavior might not have been as mysterious in the end. Right now
I'll just say that I loved Spike's taunts at Glory.

Glory clearly isn't accustomed to backtalk. ("I command you to shut up!")
A nice little contrasting moment back at the start is when Glory speaks to
her scabby minions saying, "If you love me..." and they look up at her
adoringly in eager anticipation of her command.

The fight at the end had energy in the sense that there were a lot of people
and frantic editing. But I thought the choreography was awful. Everything
seemed way too deliberate. Like I could hear them counting beats in their
head. One, two, three, punch, turn, thrust, seven, eight, fall. Now the
earlier fight in the cemetary with the Buffybot worked nicely for me. It
wasn't so fast moving, but it had the amusing bit of Anya trying to find a
staking position until Xander kicked the vamp into her. And the Buffybot
tossing the stake to Spike for him to strike with a flourish.

The way this episode plays out raises two major issues with regards to
> Spike. The first is his refusal to betray Dawn to save his own skin.
> The others naturally expect that he can't be trusted to keep his
> mouth shut under such circumstances, and their fear is justified by
> everything except what actually happens in "Intervention." His
> stated reason is all about concern for another, simply not wanting
> Buffy in particular to be in pain. That itself could be traced back to
> selfishness, of course, but what kind of altruism can't? It re-blurs
> the boundaries of what kind of empathy someone without a soul can feel.
> My instinct, and let me emphasize that this is just a first
> impression, is to say that this is "wrong." Doesn't seem to sit
> quite right. But it does get one thinking, and this is something
> I'll have to keep thinking about before making any sweeping
> pronouncements. And watching more show, of course.


A lot of people seem to struggle with this, but it's never seemed that big a
deal to me. What happens this episode is important. Buffy's perceptions
change and it suggests a new version of the Buffy/Spike relationship going
forward. But Spike's decision not to blab to Glory doesn't strike me as
remarkable or something new.

Hitting the fringes first, let me point out that Spike isn't keen on being
pushed around and isn't going to be favorably disposed to cooperating with
Glory just because she's a skanky fashion victim giving him grief. He
doesn't need a special excuse to resist Glory. He flat out doesn't like
her.

He also genuinely enjoys taunting her. Spike doesn't really want to get
beat up like he was, but getting under Glory's skin almost made it
worthwhile. To Spike, he won that encounter.

So it wasn't quite as hard for him to do that or quite as bad an experience
as it might appear. That's probably not enough reason in iteself. The
"altruistic" motive you refer to is, I believe, necessary too. I just
wanted it clear that there were other things pushing him that direction to.

I think it might also be fair to assume that at this point Spike will get
off on being heroic - for any reason. Not so much for the sake of heroism,
but because that's the kind of behavior available to him (now that he can't
ravage humans) that lets him swagger and show what a big bad he really is.
Yes, that's twisted, but that's the kind of weirdness you get from shock
induced behavior modification.

But doing it for Buffy is still the biggest thing. Just not new. He would
have done the same thing any time going back to the end of Fool For Love.
This is just the first time the situation came up. Spike's in love with
Buffy. Not talking to Glory is a natural byproduct of that. I doubt Spike
seriously thought of doing anything else.

Let me pause for a moment to note the ongoing argument about love vs.
obsession and whether vampires can love and so on and so forth. They always
frustrate me. To begin with because I don't think anybody even applies the
same meaning to the words. It seems like most of the time people are
speaking of entirely different concepts. Second because we continually
jumping back and forth between human and vampire ideas of love. It gets -
well - confusing. I call it love here because Spike does. Whatever anybody
else thinks it really is, to Spike it's love. And that means something to
him. Does it mean the same as human love? Of course not. He's a vampire.
But it still means something. It's still a passion to him. It still leads
him to act certain ways. Leading among them is a devotion that doesn't have
room for allowing foes like Glory to destroy his love. This idea isn't even
new to chipped Spike. He gave all of himself to Dru too. It nearly got him
killed in What's My Line.

This has been solidly in place since Fool For Love. Part of what happened
at the end when he put down the gun and consoled Buffy is that he made his
choice. He gave up on trying to be the vampire he used to be and devoted
himself to Buffy. When he's love's bitch, he admits it. And he's stuck to
that persistently since. Astonishingly so. The only notable exception that
I can think of is the incident with Dru. Now Dru was the one vampire with
the power to break through that decision - but only briefly - as Spike quick
enough rejected Dru's appeal and turned it around into his grandest play for
Buffy's affections yet.

The weird thing is that, to Spike, this wasn't that big a deal. Being
nearly killed by Glory was a big deal. But not the part about keeping
Dawn's secret. When Buffy came and kissed him, it stunned Spike. I'm sure
he recognized it as gratitude, but the last thing he expected was gratitude.
This from the guy who looked for gratitude for not feeding off of disaster
victims. He seems as much, if not more stunned by Buffy's remarks on what
is real. What actually matters. This is that important? Offering Dru's
life up to Buffy in the name of love - that's real to Spike. That's *his*
idea of a big deal. Not this. Not his part in it anyway. He just didn't
want to see Buffy cry.

Now mind you, Spike is unlikely to leave here with many great new
understandings. Why exactly does this earn a kiss while not drinking from
disaster victims earns disgust? I doubt Spike could answer that. But he
did learn that he really can matter to Buffy. And I think that must be
motivating.

The second issue is more about Buffy's behavior than Spike's:
> Besides a good robot imitation and a good plan to find out what she
> needs to know, human-Buffy has a kiss and some gratitude for Spike.
> That I'm not buying, particularly the former. There's the
> still-recent events of "Crush," and then more immediately there's
> the fact that he made a clone of her to have sex with. The latter is
> not something that I would expect Buffy to easily forgive and forget,
> and the former should make her extra cautious about sending anything
> that could be interpreted as mixed signals. Doesn't play well at
> all, especially the kiss. Pretending to play along with this, I wonder
> whether she knew what she was going to say from the beginning - it
> seems more likely that she was playing it by ear and trying to see if
> she could get an explanation for his burst of non-evil.


Hmmm. Ok. Those are good issues, but I think you're running a step behind
Buffy's thoughts.

First of all, to get the context set, she clearly *is* untrusting of Spike
and not at all ready to forgive and forget. On the contrary, she's ready to
kill him. The danger to Dawn that Spike poses finally brought her to that
point. The only reason Spike wasn't dusted immediately is that Buffy needs
to know what Spike actually revealed to Glory. When Xander and Giles come
back from dumping Spike at his crypt, the first thing she asks is whether
they killed him. So whatever changed, happened only after that.

Which starts in the Magic Box - not the crypt.

Xander: God, I feel ... kind of bad for the guy. Gets all whupped and his
best toy gets taken away.
Buffy: Xander. Please don't be suggesting what I'd have to kill you for
suggesting.
Xander: No, no, travesty, completely on board, it's just ... the guy was so
thrashed

Xander is hardly the first guy you would think of to express sympathy for
Spike. (This is why I wasn't keen on his seemingly easy attitude towards
Spike at the beginning. Fortunately that was eased a little by Xander later
laying down the law to Spike and being the one to raise the red flag about
Buffy going crazy.) Indeed, the whole gang had been harsh on Spike since
Crush. Remember Giles giving him his evil eye? But after Xander's brief
false start, he got down to it. The guy was so thrashed. So thrashed that
both Xander and Giles were subdued about his condition.

Buffy knew this. She'd seen Spike. She just hadn't had time to think about
it yet. Nor, probably, that they found Spike trying to escape. Whatever
went on between him and Glory, it clearly wasn't Spike pulling another Adam.
And the guy was so thrashed. That gave Buffy pause. The first seed of
doubt was planted. When Buffy went to Spike with her Buffybot scheme, I
think she probably already suspected that he hadn't been broken. But she
didn't know why, and she needed to confirm it.

Once she's in the crypt she gets to see how badly Spike is hurt again. And
that's the first thing she remarks on. His sexy wounds. Except they surely
looked pretty awful to her. And Spike's weak response demonstrated how
badly off he was. This isn't looking like the betraying scumbag she was
ready to dust not long before. I emphasize this because it's not just
Spike's words to come that impact Buffy, it's the realization of just how
far he would go for that reason. The guy was so thrashed.

Then, of course, Spike tells Buffy why he did it, and now Buffy is thrown
somewhere she never thought to be. That was the last thing she expected to
hear, but it rang true. She knows Spike well enough to see that he's being
honest. When Spike bares his feelings, he doesn't hold back. And for the
first time - in total contradiction to the understanding she thought she had
after Crush - Spike's affection for her isn't disgusting. It's life saving.

It probably bears remembering at this point that Buffy also has a great
weight lifted from her. Glory doesn't know about Dawn. The disaster she
fears hasn't happened. Her sense of relief is immense. Combined with the
revelation of just how much Spike went through for her and how important
that was to her and then you have the moment of the kiss. Which I believe
was an entirely spontaneous expression of gratitude.

What's interesting though, is that it's a kiss. She didn't just say thank
you with enthusiasm. Or hug him. Or cry. Or whatever. She kissed him on
the lips. Though it doesn't seem terribly sexual. One can debate that
forever. But my take is that Buffy knew that's what he would want and
decided right then and there that he had earned it.

Is that believable? Hell, yes. She was blown away by what he had done.
She didn't believe he had that in him. And here he is nearly dying for her
when that's exactly what she needed from him. The gratitude was genuine.

I think that no matter what, the kiss has to be somewhat a mixed message for
Spike though. But not as bad as it would have been had the scene ended
then. Fortunately for Buffy, Spike asked about the Buffybot. That gave
Buffy the chance to lay into Spike for that. And really vent by implication
her upset at all the disgusting things Spike did. I'm not entirely certain
about this - Spike's so beat up that he looks awful in any pose - but to me
it looks like Spike hangs his head in shame then. Even he knows that the
Buffybot is more than Buffy can accept.

Curiously (at least from how it looks to me), Buffy's little rant about the
Buffybot comes across as a scolding. It certainly leads up well to the
closer about what's real. Which also provides some explanation to Spike of
the kiss - hopefully reducing the mixed message aspect. I've mentioned
before how I think there's a parallel between Buffy/Spike and Xander/Anya
specifically in how Buffy has acquired the role of teaching Spike what being
human means. Here for the first time I think Buffy gets an inkling of her
job. She's giving Spike a big honking lesson in that here. Now the
question is will Spike learn it. I can't wait to see.

So...

> One-sentence summary: Has a good half and a soulless-robot half.

> AOQ rating: Decent


Also of note is that things are getting really serious with Glory. Her
minions may have made a spectacularly wrong guess with Spike. But it was
still way too close for comfort and now that Glory knows it's a human, and
presumably around Buffy, time has to be running out. Buffy still doesn't
know why Glory wants The Key, what The Key is, or how to fight Glory. Tick
tock.

I get a lot of pleasure out of this episode. Other than the final fight
it's a terrific romp. Even the torture gets filled with some nice put downs
and sets up Buffy pretending to be the Buffybot. And it has the nifty trip
to the spirit guide with her obscure message to worry about. Even so, most
of the scenes really aren't all that important, nor all that extraordinary.
So I leave it as a very high Good not quite able to make it to Excellent.
(I think there are something like six episodes this season ranked right
about there.)

One Bit Shy

[identity profile] morgantree.livejournal.com 2006-07-13 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)
*goggles*

Thanks so much for bringing us the One Bit Shy show! It's always an illuminating read. This one is particularly timely, as Intervention is the episode that precedes a story I'm working on, and Spike and Buffy's state of mind have been posing some niggling problems in the narrative.

Just love this kind of analysis!

[identity profile] morgantree.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 05:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, marvelous! Will definitely read it! Thanks.

[identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com 2006-07-13 05:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Huh. Sounds like One Bit Shy has got it right. AOQ has no sense of humour. I can see no other explanation for his failure to adore Intervention, which is one of the Best Episodes Evah, and anyone who can't see that is a right twit who will spend forever in the 7th circle of hell, which is dedicated to people who Disagree With Me. It's a terrific defence, but still I have to say "huh?" at the bit where Mr O.B. Shy says "the series
has always been willing to go blind in the service of humor". That makes it sound as if comedy has to be flawed in order to be funny - like, oh I don't know, saying that characters have to act "out of character" in order for the comedy to work. But that's simply not true of BtVS - sure, aspects fo characters get exaggerated in the comic episodes but - newsflash - this is how comedy works. It's a different *genre* from straight drama, it's not trying to achieve the same things. Saying "The Scoobies would have known it was a robot" is a stupid thing to say because what makes it *funny* is that the Buffybot is obviously not Buffy and yet they all look for a psychological explanation. And it's not "out of character" for them to be slow on the uptake, but because it's comedy the slowness gets exaggerated, to the point when it's so absurd that it's funny. I dunno, why do so many people seem to think that the only genre worth striving for is psychological realism?

On a different note, Intervention was, I think, the first episode of S5 I ever saw, and I thought Glory was hilarious. At the same time I was reading TWOP, where people were banging on about how terrible Clare Kramer was, and I just couldn't understand it. The rest of the season was a real disappointment in that respect, because in none of the other episodes does she ever reach that high point again, but her scene with Spike is freaking hilarious. Even the non-comic lines like "This? Is a vampire," are funny.

[identity profile] ibmiller.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly my thougts on comedy. I was frustrated with people who used "Him" as an example of how Buffy behaves when she's competing for love. Um, has the reviewer heard of "drama?" A thing where certain elements of reality are bent to make the audience laugh or cry? Arg. Buffy was a show, not real life, albeit a brilliant show, and treating it as real life does the writing and acting a disservice.

[identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 08:06 am (UTC)(link)
I think the trouble is that an awful lot of fans want to believe (or at least imagine) that the characters they love so much are in some sense real, that what we see on the TV screen is a Platonic shadow of that reality. They comb through episodes looking for evidence of what their favourite character is "really" like, and comedy, like lack of continuity, causes problems for this approach to fiction. One of the things about comedy, after all, is that it tends to exaggerate *bad* features rather than good ones, because goodness isn't funny. Xander fans complain that the Xander/Harmony hair-pulling contest is out of character because by then Xander has shown that he *can* fight. Since they want to believe that everything on the show is literally true in their Platonic reality, they also have to believe that the show is literally showing us that Xander is a total wuss. But comedy doesn't lend itself to this simple mapping of what happens on the show ---> true in (imaginary) reality, because comedy bends and distorts reality, it isn't even trying to be real, in fact it's trying not to be real. Xander's wussiness is an exaggeration for comic effect - it isn't a statement that the "real" Xander is this much of a wuss, anymore than Him is a statement that the "real" Buffy is this much of a bitch, or Pangs a statement that the Scoobies wouldn't care if Xander were dying of syphilis.

Sorry, you seem to have wound up on the receiving end of a Treatise on Comedy - I'm not sure how that happened.

[identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Didn't get Band Candy?? But there was such a logical reason for people to act strangely! ("I'm your watcher, so you do as I say. Now sod off!"). This is getting me worried that he won't like OMWF either. What's the bet he raises the tired old issue of how Xander would never have summoned the demon?

[identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
He thought that Band Candy was a one joke trick expanded to a whole episode.

*faints*

[identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Holy crap, not only literal-minded but moralistic as well. "Real teenagers aren't like that. What about people who were well-behaved as teenagers? I'm offended on behalf of well-behaved teenagers everywhere. They deserve representation." Because, you know, it would have been such fun to watch Giles doing his homework and getting an early night - so much more realistic than shagging Joyce over a police car.

[identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
He'll hate Tabula Rasa. And I have a feeling he'll hate Entropy, which I adore. And I'm sure he'll hate Storyteller when he gets to it.

[identity profile] earth-vexer.livejournal.com 2006-07-13 06:24 pm (UTC)(link)
It should also, by all rights, be either a dead bloody giveaway or at least a step in the direction of putting things together. I don't accept that Willow wouldn't pick up on at least some of the significance.
He's taking this episode WAY too seriously. People don't behave the same in comedy as they do in drama. This is a comedic episode, so the viewer ought to be suspending the disbelief just a little. And I agree with you, Willow *was* just about to figure out that something was up when they were interrupted.

Why bother to include the drive to Slay and do other non-Spike-focused things?
The drive to slay? Um, duh! That's part of his attraction to her! :D And yeah - he wants more than just the sex.

"Buffy, please. It takes more than a week to bleach bones."
Hee. That is a good line.

"good plan, Spike" is nice
Also good. *g*

The weird thing is that, to Spike, this wasn't that big a deal. Being nearly killed by Glory was a big deal. But not the part about keeping Dawn's secret. ... He seems as much, if not more stunned by Buffy's remarks on what is real. What actually matters. This is that important? Offering Dru's life up to Buffy in the name of love - that's real to Spike. That's *his* idea of a big deal. Not this. Not his part in it anyway. He just didn't want to see Buffy cry.
Yes. Of course! I knew this, somewhere in the back of my brain, but you've articulated this better than I ever could have. Spike is learning. :)

That was the last thing she expected to hear, but it rang true. She knows Spike well enough to see that he's being honest. When Spike bares his feelings, he doesn't hold back.
Or, why would he lie to a robot? She knows he's telling the truth because she expects he'd be honest with the robot.

I'm sad that AOQ doesn't 'get' Jane Espenson. I'm not a fan of *all* of her episodes, but I love her sense of humour.

[identity profile] earth-vexer.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Well not me, but One Bit Shy... but I was nodding along as well! :)
Ohhhh, I see. I missed the bit at the beginning where you said you were posting One Bit Shy's comments. Read too fast, I guess. And I wondered why you had "One Bit Shy" at the bottom.... :D

Yeah, but he doesn't like comedy.
What's the matter with him? ;)

You do *not* want to hear the idiotic things 3DMaster said...
Hehe. Probably not. *g*

[identity profile] petzipellepingo.livejournal.com 2006-07-13 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Why bother to include the drive to Slay and do other non-Spike-focused
> things?

Good lord! What good is a Buffybot that doesn't slay? Spike's no layabout
puffter. He wants to go on the hunt with his hunny and mix the sex in with
a few good stakings. Live (un)life large.

Hmm... if he doesn't "get" that than maybe he really doesn't understand Spike at all.
But my take is that Buffy knew that's what he would want and
decided right then and there that he had earned it.

Is that believable? Hell, yes. She was blown away by what he had done.
She didn't believe he had that in him. And here he is nearly dying for her
when that's exactly what she needed from him. The gratitude was genuine.
Nods. And Spike being the intelligent fast learner that he is "gets it". And for the rest of the Season he remembers her reaction.

gillo: (face)

[personal profile] gillo 2006-07-13 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Very nice exploration of the issues. I love this episode, and not just for the sexy wounds - but then, I rank Jane second only to Joss most of the time. It offers spectacular opportunities for JM to show his range too.

What did AOQ think of "The Body"?
gillo: (shirtless)

[personal profile] gillo 2006-07-14 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh dear. Only one of the greatest and most powerful TV programmes ever made.

Never mind.

[identity profile] spikeylover.livejournal.com 2006-07-13 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
This is the episode that changed my affection for BTVS from love to obsession. Hopefully he will change his rating as the season goes on, because what the slayer guide says can be taken to heart all the way up till CHOSEN.

And Spike in this episode? I fell head over heels. He found the scene where he makes the run towards the elevator and pulls those doors open desperately as nothing to think about, when it brought tears to my eyes the first time I saw it, and still moves me..

[identity profile] pluckyantihero.livejournal.com 2006-07-13 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
(loves)

Was this posted to AOQ? I certainly hope so.
ext_15169: Self-portrait (Default)

[identity profile] speakr2customrs.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
I'm certainly more in tune with One Bit Shy's comments than with AOQ's (which are so inane that I no longer understand why his reviews are respected) but even those are flawed.

It's not really the First Slayer, which is probably why it doesn't match well with Restless. It's something calling herself the guide using the First Slayer's form.

Yes it is the First Slayer. The Guide is a puma. I would have thought it was fairly easy to tell the difference (fur, number of legs, tail) but apparently not to some people. The cast list confirms that it is indeed the First Slayer, played by Sharon Ferguson, and it matches perfectly with Restless.


This from the guy who looked for gratitude for not feeding off of disaster
victims.


And who, when he didn't get that gratitude, went right on helping the disaster victims. It's amazing how many people didn't notice that.

[identity profile] ibmiller.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, what fun. This makes me want to find something to write controversially on. Or go join controversial discussion groups. Or just live vicariously through LJ! Oh, wait, already doing that. :-)

Oh, no, not Jane! Aside from having the coolest name (with Jane Austen as a namesake, what name could be cooler?), Espenson seems to me second only to Joss in terms of dialogue. Rabbit trail - I've finally discerned the distinction between my favorite plot episodes and my favorite dialogue episodes. The writer isn't super responsible for the plot - that seems more of a group effort, but is almost completely responsible for dialogue. So I'm glad I know Joss wrote the church scene in "Beneath You," because really, I don't like Douglas Petrie that much. Despite "Fool For Love," his language seems very leaden to me.

And One Bit Shy does seem to be quite the humorist himself (or is it her?)

Well, duh, Buffy knows the bot is a robot. Other than an evil spirit manifestation (and could the cute bot really be evil?), what else could it be in the verse of Ted and April? Plus, the gang isn't Buffy, and thus doesn't have the a priori assumption that things that look like Buffy but are not me are obviously not Buffy. Um, yeah. What he said.
Sort of like how Wills didn't notice that Buffy was anything but depressed in "Beer Bad" -"Four of them! Then, group sex?" Hee hee.

Anyway, I think Willow really was starting on the path of figuring stuff out
when they got interrupted by even bigger and more alarming news.


Very interesting point - never noticed that (or several other points he made). Good analytical mind at work here - as well as sharp wit.

Ah, Spike. All he wants is hunny to make his rumbly tummy quiet. Of course Spike wants Buffybot to slay. What would a smart but somewhat morally challenge vampire do with a boring sexbot?

Great analysis of Buffy's turning away from slaying - as I mentioned above, I never thought of that. Then again, the whole "It was 2 o clock in the morning after I've been watching Buffy for six hours straight" could have something to do with that.

"Apparently, someone told them that the vision quest consists of me driving them to the desert, doing the hokey pokey until a spooky Rasta-mama slayer arrives and speaks to them in riddles."

That's got to be one of my favorite continuity references. Laughing very much out loud.

I'm glad the "Spike doesn't like being told what to do" parts of his motivations are seen as "fringes" and his love for Buffy is the main drive. I was worried for a moment there that One Bit Shy had missed the point. But I am reassured.

The point about Spike's shock-induced enjoyment of heroism is fascinating - I knew he loved fighting, but heroism as a way to gain attention and respect - that never occurred to me.

And neither did that particular view of the end of "Fool for Love" - I thought it was just how Spike would act - I didn't see it as a turning point for him, deciding at that moment to be a fool for love. I just assumed that that moment had happened eariler. Now, I'm not so sure.

Don't know what One Bit Shy means about the debate over what love is. I don't think the definition of "love" is that hard at all - it seems to me that it is wanting the best for the beloved. As for being in love, that's a bit more complicated, but in so much that it is love and not attraction, I think it's the same thing at heart. Vampire love would be the same thing, but with a very different (as in, immoral) idea of what is "best" for the beloved. But I'm getting into territory I really should save for my good vs evil essay clump. Arg. And here I am commenting. Oh well.

I always thought that Xander's remark about being trashed was him suggesting the plan of Buffy pretending to be the bot. Though Shy's ideas here make sense, I'm still not sure that he wasn't at all hinting at that scheme in the "trashed" line.

Great commentary!

[identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, duh, Buffy knows the bot is a robot. Other than an evil spirit manifestation (and could the cute bot really be evil?), what else could it be in the verse of Ted and April?

Well, Xander thinks it could be a splitting-in-two spell, like in Replacement ("Oh, I get it! They're both Buffy!"), but I agree that Buffy is less likely to jump to that conclusion herself, since she didn't feel split in two.

[identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, now you come to mention it, the Buffybot and Something Blue Buffy do have a lot in common.

[identity profile] owenthurman.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 09:20 am (UTC)(link)
I always wonder that people can watch the episode and think "special programming," "scenario responses," and "special skills" have anything to do with sex.

Spike wants a strong and heroic partner and he'd get bored very quick without the "time to slay" bits of the bot.

Also the commentary on what a vampire is and what the soul does from AoQ seems to be too naïve and literalist. BtVS doesn't tell you the important parameters of the supernatural, it shows you. Just because Giles and Angel are telling us various stories about what a vampire is and what a soul is doesn't mean that they're the given truth. Wouldn't be nearly as interesting that way.

Also, the sledgehammer (until they reversed what it was all about in Wrecked):

Intervention:
First Slayer You are full of love. You love with all your soul. It's brighter than the fire -- blinding -- that is why you pull away from it.
Buffy I'm full of love? I'm not losing it?
FS Only if you reject it. Love is pain and the Slayer forges strength from pain. Love. Give. Forgive. Risk the pain. It is your nature. Love will bring you to your gift.
B What?

Smashed:

Spike I wasn't planning on hurting you, much.
Buffy You haven't even come close to hurting me.
S Afraid to give me the chance?

[identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 12:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I always wonder that people can watch the episode and think "special programming," "scenario responses," and "special skills" have anything to do with sex.

It's Warren's embarrassed giggle when he mentions the "ah, special skills". The viewer's mind (or at least my mind) immediately goes to a very dirty place - hell, if the skills are special enough to embarrass Warren, sexbot-builder extraordinaire, they must be really special.

[identity profile] owenthurman.livejournal.com 2006-07-15 08:57 am (UTC)(link)
until they reversed what it was all about in Wrecked
Not sure I get your drift. Splainy please?


Smashed seemed so wholesome and getting-in-touch-with-yourself and sexy. And Spike was discovering he didn't really want to go back to what he was. And Buffy was finally taking a risk with her feelings and following her spirit quest. It seemed like there were plenty of dramatic problems but they'd taken a first step toward dealing with things instead of letting them get out of hand.

Then it turned out that kinky sex was a metaphor for badness somehow. Which is so far from my world I never really got the emotional arc for the rest of the season. Not that I don't understand it after reading about it, but just that I am incapable of feeling it as if it were a real emotional arc.
shapinglight: (Default)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2006-07-14 12:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Like you said, AOQ's loss. I'm glad the other guy was able to set him right. Did he respond at all?