Entry tags:
Mostly so I can use this icon...
Re. Amazon wanting to publish fanfic... Please tell me someone remembers FanLib? The pinata donkey? Blue guy and pink guy?

(I'm still a member of
life_wo_fanlib, which gave me many things, this icon amongst them.)
For anyone who wasn't around 5 - 6 years ago, Fanlore gives a good summary of what happened. Amazon seems slightly less clueless, but then that isn't hard... (Those ads STILL crack me up.)
(I'm still a member of
For anyone who wasn't around 5 - 6 years ago, Fanlore gives a good summary of what happened. Amazon seems slightly less clueless, but then that isn't hard... (Those ads STILL crack me up.)

no subject
no subject
no subject
They are doing interesting things on Amazon. We now have "e-serials", these are serial novels, where you get a chapter a week. Twelve weeks in all. I don't know it sounds frustrating and one more thing to keep track of, but people seem to love it.
no subject
no subject
Well, Amazon will only do it if the canon creators okay it, so that gets rid of the primary reason you Don't Charge For Fic.
There are two immediate problems that I see. One is the terms and conditions would make many writers of original fiction run screaming and flailing in the other direction. But it isn't original fiction, and it occurs to me that some of the conditions may be there to protect the canon creators as well.
The other problem is, what would this do to fandom and the ficcing community? And I honestly don't know. The optimist in me says that fandom won't suffer much at all, most people will keep most of their writing free (really, you would have to, if only so that people would know the sort of thing they're buying) and paid fanfic will settle into a niche somewhere between tie-in novels and ordinary fanfic. My pessimistic side says that this will lead to DRAMA! PAIN! and dying communities, with blood and bitter tears on both sides.
Dunno. And it may be a moot point, since so far, only three canon creators have agreed to the whole scheme. Right now, it could easily die on the vine.
no subject
no subject
That...was the cluebus that they are trying to make a mint off of people who want to be published and don't understand what the basic ideals of fanfiction are: freedom of expression, FREE and protected as a class from vultures.
Guess the publishing houses can't wait to find MORE ways to rip off authors and take their stuff and pass it around like a hot potato...
I hope it dies. QUICKLY.
Anyone wants me, I'll be here, at AO3, Teaspoon and FF.Net.
no subject
Still, though. Like, take TVD for example. Amazon can publish TVD fic. Does this mean that, say, maybe they won't like TVD fic being up elsewhere?
no subject
no subject
And, of course, it could be a real bummer for the people who currently write the official tie-in books, like
no subject
It died a lovely death & helped create AO3. *fond memories*
no subject
As for the Amazon thing, then well. Time will tell.
no subject
LOL.
They are doing interesting things on Amazon. We now have "e-serials", these are serial novels, where you get a chapter a week.
Now that could work. But fic... There's no incentive for the writers. Or readers. Apart from a vague veneer of 'respectability', but what does fandom care about 'respectability'?
no subject
Totally my pleasure. It was fun to walk down memory lane...
I expect the Amazon effort to go the way of FanLib. Fanfic seems to actively resist monetization unless it takes the form of writers taking their stuff down to rework it into original fic.
*nods* Companies see 'fanfic' but never in the context of fandom which means that they don't understand it at all...
no subject
The Amazon thing... looks less fun. Get a pinata donkey already! (We never did find out why they used a pinata donkey, or what it was supposed to have to do with fanfic. But oh, it's sealed onto my mind forever more...)
no subject
Have you found a link to the actual legalese? What I've found says that they're buying all rights (which is typical for official tie-in novels and, IIRC, Harlequin serials) and that they're buying the rights to "new elements" that you include in your story. That last sounds like they're trying to define fanon in legal terminology, which . . . given how much the fanfic community is based on gentlepersons' agreements, I have no idea how that will work. If at all.
I really want to see what the people at Dear Author say about it. And Making Light, and Absolute Write; if nothing else, they'll be going through the fine print with a microscope. Amazon is doing a few things right, IMO. They're not demanding any sort of buy-in fee, which is a sure sign of a publishing scam. And they also mention a term of copyright; I wonder what it is?
I guess I'm basically neutral and moderately intrigued, at the moment. But that could change fast if there's evidence that they're going for the rip-off.
no subject
If I ever got published--especially if something I wrote got made into a film or TV series--I'd have no problems with people writing their own fanfic and sharing it with others, but I would not want anyone making money on it. As a writer, that's your livelihood, and now any kid with a laptop can make money off something you created? It would be different I guess with something in the public domain.
The whole spirit of fanfic is you do it for fun. I'm old enough to remember the days of fanzines, not only for the great stories but for the sometimes amazing fan art. It's supposed to be something you do for love. I'm a bit leery of people doing it for money, unless they have a contract to create official tie-in products. I love amazon, but it's hard not to feel a little weirded out by this.
And LOL over Pink Guy/ Blue Guy and the pinata. Too funny!
no subject
Saw in the paper today that it's only tv shows and book series copyright holders that have granted permission. Why would they? If you buy the fanfic, the writer of the fanfic and the original copyright holder of the property would get paid. So say you wrote a Doctor Who fic, you and the copyright holder of Doctor Who (I'm guessing BBC?) would share the royalty. Which is why it appeals to the original copyright holder - you get paid without doing anything, plus more free publicity. Win-Win. The fanfic writer would get a following, get paid for their work, and feel validated. (Although I'm guessing it wouldn't be much, and hello - the price they'd have to pay to get it formatted and onto Amazon.)
But here's the thing - you can only get paid for writing fanfic for tv shows, books, and films that have granted permission.
So far just Twilight, Vamp Diaries and Gossip Girl have signed up.
(Sigh. I don't read the fanfic for those).
no subject
no subject
no subject
That is hilarious.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm guessing AO3 is currently iron cladding all its legalese...
no subject
*nods* We had all these discussions back when FanLib appeared... Of course it didn't help that FamLib was so clueless as to be ridiculous, quite simply not understanding the problems at all.
If I ever got published--especially if something I wrote got made into a film or TV series--I'd have no problems with people writing their own fanfic and sharing it with others, but I would not want anyone making money on it. As a writer, that's your livelihood, and now any kid with a laptop can make money off something you created? It would be different I guess with something in the public domain.
Well there are plenty of people who write tie-in novels etc (for Star Trek & Doctor Who), but with fic it becomes a minefield...
The whole spirit of fanfic is you do it for fun. I'm old enough to remember the days of fanzines, not only for the great stories but for the sometimes amazing fan art. It's supposed to be something you do for love.
Mmmmm. I still remember the kerfuffle over cousinjean which was only skirting the issues of this and goodness that got ugly. :(
And LOL over Pink Guy/ Blue Guy and the pinata. Too funny!
They clearly thought that fic writers had the cultural understanding of gnats. As opposed to being the most sophisticated consumers out there, dissecting everything...
no subject
LOL!
Saw in the paper today that it's only tv shows and book series copyright holders that have granted permission. Why would they? If you buy the fanfic, the writer of the fanfic and the original copyright holder of the property would get paid. So say you wrote a Doctor Who fic, you and the copyright holder of Doctor Who (I'm guessing BBC?) would share the royalty. Which is why it appeals to the original copyright holder - you get paid without doing anything, plus more free publicity. Win-Win. The fanfic writer would get a following, get paid for their work, and feel validated. (Although I'm guessing it wouldn't be much, and hello - the price they'd have to pay to get it formatted and onto Amazon.)
Yeah I can see the attraction. But. Fic is not something that can be easily labelled or contained. It's going to get hideously complicated...
But here's the thing - you can only get paid for writing fanfic for tv shows, books, and films that have granted permission.
And the list ain't great... It'll be fun to see if Supernatural signs up & what they'll do with the Wincest. ;)
no subject
You know, I am so GRATEFUL for AO3? It was set up for this very specific reason. (I need to import more of my fic, but that's something else...)
Dunno. And it may be a moot point, since so far, only three canon creators have agreed to the whole scheme. Right now, it could easily die on the vine.
Let's all hope so!
no subject
Mmmm. And fandom is savvy. Publishers never seem to understand this.
no subject
Considering the fact that they are already selling a serial on Amazon, which had been previously removed due to content issues than put back again, which is well ...how to put this? Supernatural Wincest meets Spike torture fic, except in the real world and no supernatural metaphors to hide behind.
I wish I could remember the name of it. I clearly blocked it out.
Ah found it : Flesh Cartel - Capture #1 Go read the description of that and explain to me why Amazon would bulk at porn or Wincest?
Fic is not something that can be easily labelled or contained. It's going to get hideously complicated...
The problem with doing things for "money" is they stop being fun. You start having to cater to whomever is distributing, sponsoring, or buying the thing that you are creating. There is a difference between "work" and "play" after all. It's often why I hate to show people watecolors or art that I've done or things I've written - suddenly it becomes "work".
It's like blogging on livejournal vs. doing a professional blog that you want to make money off of. The LJ blog is looser, more typos, more spontaneous, more personal, more fun. The professional blog is proofed, beteaed, edited, with attention to detail.
Fanfic vs. Published is the same. I remember sue_world kicking my ass for doing critiques of fanfic - she stated that fanfic shouldn't be critiqued in the same way published or professional writing was. The writer was having fun. And trying something new. It was a safe haven for people to play with writing. She has a point. Which is why publishing fanfiction doesn't quite work.
EL James stated at Romantic Times Convention that 50 Shades of Gray was not self-published. She'd gone through a publisher, and used her husband's agent, and marketed it. While it may have started as "fanfic", the final produce was published and as a result...got a different sort of attention and different rules applied. When it was just a fanfic, it didn't matter what she did or if it reminded Twilight readers of Twilight. When it becomes something else - people tore it apart.
The world is highly critical of art or rather anything that does not meet its expectations. Even fandom is to an extent. But...writing fanfic vs. writing a novel and getting it professionally or self-published, is the difference between sharing something you wrote with close friends or people that are like-minded and well, the world.
[ETA: This is becoming embarrassing, I really need to edit these posts before posting.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Ah but that's exactly what I mean. Would Fifty Shades have been accepted by a publisher if it'd been Bella/Edward indulging in BDSM?
The problem with doing things for "money" is they stop being fun. You start having to cater to whomever is distributing, sponsoring, or buying the thing that you are creating. There is a difference between "work" and "play" after all. It's often why I hate to show people watecolors or art that I've done or things I've written - suddenly it becomes "work".
This. A fic writer is beholden to no one. You can write fairy!fic or penguin AUs and even if you have no readers at all, it doesn't matter. But if people are *paying* you need to tick all kinds of boxes. (I'm reminded of Moffat talking about how he doesn't write the show (Doctor Who) for the fans. There might be thousands of fans, but there's millions of audience. And he needs to write for the audience.)
Fanfic vs. Published is the same. I remember sue_world kicking my ass for doing critiques of fanfic - she stated that fanfic shouldn't be critiqued in the same way published or professional writing was. The writer was having fun. And trying something new. It was a safe haven for people to play with writing. She has a point. Which is why publishing fanfiction doesn't quite work.
*nods* Not that people shouldn't make an effort with their fic, but the rules are completely different - a fic writer writes for fandom exclusively.
When it was just a fanfic, it didn't matter what she did or if it reminded Twilight readers of Twilight. When it becomes something else - people tore it apart.
Uh-huh. And not exactly the best advert for fanfic...
The world is highly critical of art or rather anything that does not meet its expectations. Even fandom is to an extent. But...writing fanfic vs. writing a novel and getting it professionally or self-published, is the difference between sharing something you wrote with close friends or people that are like-minded and well, the world.
And the world is mean. Just look at how people tear TV shows apart every week...
[ETA: This is becoming embarrassing, I really need to edit these posts before posting.]
LOL. Don't worry. I embrace the edit button with all my heart.
no subject
ETA: Admittedly this is true of American TV which has taken off like gangbusters, it may be different elsewhere. American TV writers and stars sort of walk around as if they are entitled and god's gift, yet oddly lack the talent or perspective of British Stars.
no subject
The concept of "editing" appears to be lost on me.
no subject
Hmmm. Yes you definitely have an American perspective. Over here it's much smaller. And the Voices of the Internet can do real damage... (If I have time later, I'll go find the relevant quote from The Writers Tale.)
Not that people shouldn't be allowed to express their opinion - but fandom is not the best place for general feedback. Fans have an agenda, other than just being entertained. (I'm not really disagreeing, just trying to look at all the different sides.)
no subject
no subject
TV shows do what they want. They are mostly worried about Neilsen ratings (not internet determined) or advertisers. Keep in mind that in the US we have over 1000 channels.
Also, we have commercials. The only tv channels that don't are PBS and the premium (subscriber) channels. And tv shows are cut, even for PBS, for commercial breaks. Doctor Who has about five minutes cut out of it. As does most of the BBC shows that air here - or so I'm told. Dowton Abbey had ten minutes cut out of it.
So there is a huge cultural divide in how we view tv. I remember visiting the UK back in the 1980s and being blown away by how different UK tv and movie theaters were. You showed commercials in movie theaters but not on TV shows. Also there wasn't that much tv on.
Here? TV salaries are astronomical. TV actors make upwards to 100,000 an episode on the low end, and 2 million on the high end. When they film, they block off whole blocks and the trailers take up half a block.
Directors and writers make up to 20,000, to 100, 000 an episode, sometimes more. And there are 22 episodes a year here, not 6 or 13.
We really are very different. So in the US there's an attitude regarding tv which is different than the Brits...a sort of snarky attitude. We call TV the idiot box. And make fun of tv shows. I've made fun of them or had others make fun of them since I was 8. Most TV in the US is low art, very rarely do we get high art. Keep in mind there are over 1000 tv series on as I write this and 85% of them have the cultural value of the Bachelor.
no subject
And oh, we have adverts too - it's only the BBC where we don't. And there we have adverts for the BBC inbetween programmes. Still, it's definitely not the same.
Plus, TV is much, much, much smaller. Doctor Who is a Juggernaut, yet the running theme of The Writers Take is Rusty begging for more money because they never have enough. (I'm not sure this is a bad thing. Not having enough money makes people inventive.)
no subject
The Wire, Sopranos, Mad Men, Walking Dead, Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones are all on cable. You have to pay for those shows. And they tend to be a higher quality and higher production values. Those are critically acclaimed here.
But we have tv shows that are just...not up to that caliber. And have lower production values, which you probably don't see. And a lot of it is ...similar to one another. Currently watch "Revolution" which is amongst the better ones, but it is silly and very comic booky. Not sure you get it over there or not.
Also, keep in mind tv producers, directors, writers, actors and crew in the US are paid twice the amount they are in the UK.
no subject
And thus we will forever hold each other in esteem! :)
Also, keep in mind tv producers, directors, writers, actors and crew in the US are paid twice the amount they are in the UK.
Only twice? I'd have thought it'd be more...
Anyway our TV outputs clearly range from the sublime to the ridiculous on both sides of the pond!