elisi: Edwin holding a tiny snowman (River (smug))
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2012-11-08 07:53 pm
Entry tags:

[identity profile] masakochan.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh Rush Limbaugh. I honestly wish the Crack from S5 would come have him for an appetizer. Even though it'd probably get sick afterwards.

He's one of the talk-radio guys that my dad listens too, and my dad honestly believes he's "just a good guy whose misunderstood." hfjdksahfksa

Oh, and have you heard of these two tumblrs:

White People Mourning Mitt Romney

The response (to the above): Minorities Mourning Mitt Romney (I snorted so hard after I clicked the link on this one).

[identity profile] beer-good-foamy.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Meanwhile, The Internet Found Mitt Romney's Victory Website!

ETA: Also, a Venn diagram of every single Obama conspiracy. Unsure of whether he's a lizard, a muslim, a communist, or just plain black? Now you can know for sure!
Edited 2012-11-08 20:33 (UTC)

[identity profile] masakochan.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty my parents actually believe most of the ones in the Muslim/Terrorist and Kenyan/'Not one of us' circles. :/

It's like sad!Fox News headquarters over at my house, and probably throughout both sides of my family.

[identity profile] jeymien.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
... Rush Limbaugh...


Even that rant of his is out of touch with reality....

[identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)

Look, he may have not been the most optimal candidate, but he's a fine man. He would have been great for this country.

Not being transparent at all in that one.

I'd say Santa was the one who lost. After all, Romney was just a made up figment by the right.

[identity profile] jeymien.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
*nods. Yeah. I don't get the current Republicans at all. I don't know if it's cause I'm Canadian and I totally can see the benefit of a system of healthcare that isn't run by the insurance companies... And the stuff he talks about being small stuff.. It's big stuff! Money away from PBS (big bird) is money away from educational media, something sorely lacking when you look at the American media. The War on Women/binders? That's not small stuff. Women's body's shouldn't be legislated. That's about equality! I know it's s slippery slope argument, but once you start legislating the body, how much further is it before women should be baby factories, not working, not voting, whatever? It dehumanizes the person to take choice away from them. Let's not even add in the whole women in the workplace/binders of women bs (something Romney had no right to claim, he didn't put any effort into that, it was presented to him by outside parties).

"The old capitalism, the old arguments of hard work, stick-to-itiveness, self-reliance, charity, helping out in the community." This is not what the Republicans said. The message the Republicans put out there was that they were not for equality - race, sexual orientation, gender. Obama was the one talking about charity and helping out in the community.

I sincerely hope that the Republican party and it's supporters can get their heads out of their asses. The first Republican president was Lincoln. Has any of that party even understood the first sentence of his Gettysberg address, one of the most quoted sentences in American history? The man was about equality! When you look over what each Republican president is known for.. quite a few were very focused on civil rights. You read their histories, so many of those early presidents wouldn't recognize their party anymore, their ideals are with current Democratic parties.

Anyways, yeah. I am flabbergasted at the Republicans now.
Edited 2012-11-08 21:51 (UTC)

[identity profile] jeymien.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Also... have you seen this?

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151299959267177&set=a.10150134893762177.329350.609677176&type=1&theater

Hope it works for you.
ext_2453: (Default)

[identity profile] mangosorbet007.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh my.

[identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)

The definitions change over the years as the smaller factions attempt to take prominence. Bush wasn't fiscally conservative and neither is Romney but that's who they're trying to court so that's the label they apply to themselves.

They toss around phrases like redistribution of wealth in scary tones while ignoring that supply-side economics does exactly that when they refuse to close the loopholes that benefits companies from shipping jobs overseas.

Of course if they were actual conservatives they'd come up with a plan to close the $300B/yr tax gap from people who simply don't pay what they owe. Then they wouldn't need to raise taxes.

But yeah, the guy who advocates feeding and taking care of people is the antichrist.

[identity profile] zimshan.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
The very thing they were so afraid of the last four years. Well, at least this election delivered reality to some of them. Though they'll never admit they're all just horrible, racist, vindictive dicks. But better than nothing.

[identity profile] 10littlebullets.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
For serious. I lean libertarian (in the "social liberalism but fiscal restraint" way, not the "we'd make Ayn Rand required reading in all school curricula if the very existence of school curricula weren't an intolerable infringement of personal liberty" way), and side-eye the American left's tendency to slap band-aids on giant hemorrhaging wounds and then descend into magical thinking and demagoguery with whoever's not happy about it. But man, at least they're trying, and they're more-or-less what it says on the tin. I'll take "overtax and overspend, partly on social programs ranging from vital to benignly ineffectual, partly on boondoggles for assorted rent-seeking interest groups" over "undertax, overspend on the military-industrial complex and boondoggles for assorted really scary rent-seeking interest groups, justify it by pinching pennies from school-lunch programs, try to ram Christian fundamentalism into everyone's private lives, and cap it all off by claiming to be the party of small government." Aside from being a far more unpleasant form of fiscal irresponsibility, that's just insulting.

Ditto regulation. Does anyone really approve of the half-assed thickets of red tape that emerged from the Democrats' attempts to reform health care and financial markets? I doubt it, but I sure as shit am not going to vote them out when the Republicans are waiting in the wings to craft efficient legislation that will neatly rig the game in favor of financiers and oligopolists.

Unusually enough for Rush Limbaugh, that article would almost be a seductive line of reasoning if the only major alternative to the Democrats actually represented "hard work, stick-to-itiveness, self-reliance" and all the rest. But the Republicans have jumped off Batshit Cliff and are too busy rolling around in the guano cushion at the bottom, trading vitriol about everyone up above who hasn't taken the plunge, to represent much of anything. Rush accusing Obama voters of believing in Santa Claus is, well, a bit rich.

[identity profile] a-phoenixdragon.livejournal.com 2012-11-08 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
As usual, ol Rush contradicts himself no less than five times in one rant.

What gravy train? The economy is in the toilet. How would Romney, who operates overseas corporations in China, help OUR country. He says it's all about hard work, yet the people who work hard are the 47% he said is not worth his time. He came from a hardworking, down to earth people? PLEASE. He came from a rich household. He's never worked a day in his life.

Glad we all saw his 1950's ideal, uptight, backwards little white supremist vision for what it was and ousted him. If only we could sew Rush's lips shut. then there would be less garbage littering our airwaves.

[identity profile] kita0610.livejournal.com 2012-11-09 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
Republicans: A government just small enough to fit in my vagina.

[identity profile] kita0610.livejournal.com 2012-11-09 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
THIS IS FUCKING GLORIOUS.

[identity profile] soundingsea.livejournal.com 2012-11-09 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. Yes, he and his ilk are outnumbered, and GOOD.

[identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com 2012-11-09 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
Hey, believe it or not, it's an improvement. Remember 4 years ago they were still insisting that they surrounded us. Now they at least recognize that's... not so true. ;)

Maybe in four more years they'll realize that Obama actually did show his birth certificate.
ext_2333: "That's right,  people, I am a constant surprise." (flower and frog)

[identity profile] makd.livejournal.com 2012-11-09 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
May I borrow that for a personalized T-shirt?

Seriously. That is a great, great, line!
ext_2333: "That's right,  people, I am a constant surprise." (flower and frog)

[identity profile] makd.livejournal.com 2012-11-09 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
four more years and the numbers of minorities will be even bigger. :-)

[identity profile] kita0610.livejournal.com 2012-11-09 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
Sure, I didn't coin it- but I did clean it up. The original quote was 'twat', although I cannot for the life of me remember WHERE I read it initially.

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/opalescence_/ 2012-11-10 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
He's over it already. :-)
ext_2333: "That's right,  people, I am a constant surprise." (puckish)

[identity profile] makd.livejournal.com 2012-11-10 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
Doesn't matter, Kita; it's perfect! One of the topics guaranteed to drive me up the great wall of rants is the irony of the Small Government Party's obsession with people's sexual behavior. (makes bilabial fricative sound.)
ext_2333: "That's right,  people, I am a constant surprise." (Default)

[identity profile] makd.livejournal.com 2012-11-10 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
precisement!

\0/

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/opalescence_/ 2012-11-11 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
Well of course we can't stop the change, but I sure hope we change our platform to adjust to it.

Being fiscally conservative -- wanting to cut spending and lower taxes -- is NOT going to go away.

(Anonymous) 2012-11-11 01:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, he most certainly would have been.

[identity profile] soundingsea.livejournal.com 2012-11-12 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
I did see that! So awesome. :)