elisi: Edwin holding a tiny snowman (Mock!Bangel by crackers4jenn)
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2006-07-12 10:02 am
Entry tags:

Bad Eggs. A few B/A thoughts...

[livejournal.com profile] ibmiller put it very well in his comment to my previous post:

Though sometimes I wonder where the Bangels come from - soulmates? All they did was skate and kiss before he went evil.

Watching the B/A interaction in Bad Eggs, it doesn't scream 'Eternal Love' - what I see is two kids (I know Angel is 200+, but I doubt he's ever been in love before, so I'm going by emotional maturity) who are madly in love. I remember feeling like that. Being completely wrapped up in someone else and thinking that spending every waking minute kissing would be the best possible way of spending my life! :) And it's a wonderful feeling. But it's not eternal love.

Buffy and Angel do very little talking - and are seriously neglectful of what they *should* be doing. The Gorch brothers are sat on the cemetary wall, watching, wondering why the heck Angelus is madly snogging the Slayer. Being so lost in each other, they completely fail to see the warning signs - the 'sex education lesson' is as subtle as a sledge hammer, but Buffy obviously pays no attention. Xander and Cordy are the ones talking, but they're not the ones about to give in to their passion. The negative consequences of sex are to be experienced by Buffy, and it'll be nothing as simple as pregnancy.

See there's a difference between being 'in love' and actual, mature love. That's not to say that one can't develop into the other, but they're not the same.

(I've love to talk about this at length, but sadly that RL thing is intruding again. Blah. Thoughts? Comments?)

[identity profile] thalia-seawood.livejournal.com 2006-07-12 10:16 am (UTC)(link)
I agree completely.
If Angel and Buffy had a long term relationship - free of the loss-of-soul disaster - I believe things wouldn't work out at all. Angel is just very dominant. Sure, he wants to protect Buffy from harm, but to do so he takes her choices away which is not fair to her at all. Add to this that Buffy is strong willed and full of spirit. So I think that eventually they would start arguing frequently.
I also think they are so in love they don't really see one another at all. They conveniently overlook their character flaws.

Nevertheless, Angel is Buffy's first love - a tragic and forbidden love, too, which makes her feelings even more intense. So for her, he will always be very special and uber-special. Whenever she thinks back to him in later seasons, she appears to still overlook his flaws. (Need to watch the end of season 7 yet, of course.)

Now if they met again after ATS has ended, I could see them build a new relationship. They both had to accept though that they have grown and changed - and were never that wonderfully perfect in the first place. They would have to look beyond the blissful haze of first love.

[identity profile] thalia-seawood.livejournal.com 2006-07-12 11:16 am (UTC)(link)
See I remember very clearly when I first met Darcy - and I thought that it must be impossible to disagree on anything, even though I knew we probably would, down the line somewhere. And we do - frequently.

Oh yes, I also thought my Mr T was basically perfect and that it was more or less my fault when we had problems. :-) Nowadays, I see things a lot more realistically. Love as I define it means that you know the flaws of your partner - and you deal with them. :-) There are times, when I love him for his flaws and there are times when I just want to kick him. When it matters, I would always back him up, though.

[identity profile] ibmiller.livejournal.com 2006-07-12 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Great post! I think you've really nailed the Bangel relationship pre-Surprise. Plus, your discussion here on love just makes me more determined to write my essay on good and evil in Buffy (and in general), since I think love plays a big part in the nature of good.

[identity profile] ibmiller.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 01:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Too true - and hopefully the essay will be started next week.

[identity profile] zimshan.livejournal.com 2006-07-12 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)
HAHA. When I finally saw the second season a second time and saw how little they really gave us about Angel and Buffy BEFORE he went evil, and then made it some ridiculously HUGE tradegy when he did, and then had to kill him. I laughed my head off. Like, Halloween when he randomly asks if she loves him and she says 'yes' even though they JUST got together, what, three eps before? Second season is lovely but people that continuely say it was the best season kinda need to have their heads examined.

[identity profile] frelling-tralk.livejournal.com 2006-07-12 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't remember if soulmate was a word actually used on the show, but I do think season 3 was the season that build up B/A "eternal love" more. Season 2 was the bad boyfriend season, and I think that early episodes did a horrible job of developing them as a couple. Maybe they had their eyes on the end goal more, so weren't worried about showing why Buffy and Angel fell in love. We suddenly get "oh boy" in Teacher's Pet for Buffy's lusty feelings, but eh. Angel was a nice season 1 episode, but early season 2 when they were having weird arguments about "Oh I wwas going to be at the Bronze, I was playing cool". Umm feel the UST.

I did like their kisses in What's My Line, Ted, Bad Eggs, early morning scene in Surprise, but the build-up before then sucked.
liliaeth: (Default)

[personal profile] liliaeth 2006-07-12 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, but the problem with s3 is that the B/A got so over the top, that they even mocked it themselves in the Zeppo. The whole drama of it, just doesn't feel real to me, more like it's dragged out to keep DB under contract, so they'd have him ready for 'Angel'

I still say, that if the curse hadn't been there, they would have broken up within a month and Buffy would have long been over Angel. Mostly because they are far far too alike to be a good couple.

[identity profile] ibmiller.livejournal.com 2006-07-13 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
Hmmm, I always thought that the season three Bangel stuff was the only stuff that felt real to me. Admittedly, there was a bit too much soulful "We souldn't" "We must" "Oh, Buffy, I love you so much I almost forgot to brood!" "Bite me"... oh, wait, that was a different season three. Sorry. Still think it was a nice relationship. And I thought the point of "The Zeppo" was that everything was mocked except what was usually mocked - Xander. The world is ending, lovers' hearts are breaking, Willow's doing magic, and Xander is - saving everyone? Great stuff. I can't believe he just had sex.

Oh, the randomness.

Anyway, the point of my self-indulgent references is that I think that season three, while a bit melodramatic, is no more so than any other season of Buffy - and I enjoyed Buffy and Angel's love in that season. His speech to her in "Helpless," though not as touching as Spike's in "Touched," is a nice look at why, not just that they fell in love.

Am very curious how you think Buffy and Angel are too alike. The only thing I can think of is that they both tend to be generally altruistic (as opposed to Spike, who is personally loyal - though Buffy does show those tendencies where Angel doesn't). I think of Buffy as a much more in-the-moment, energetic, active, passionate person, while Angel is much more introspective, alone, and intellectual (not intelligent, intellectual. It's a bent, not a measure of ability). However, I would love to hear your ideas about their commonalities.

[identity profile] ibmiller.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 02:56 pm (UTC)(link)
True in so far as it goes - but I still don't see that the obstacle to their relationship is that they're too similar (except for the shutting down thing - they need a Cordy or a Spike to draw them out). Angel's need to be a hero (which isn't necessarily bad, I think, just bad for him and Buffy) is a problem, but I don't think that Buffy's approach to heroism is that similar to his.

Normal couple? Buffy ain't not normal. So why do we want her to be a normal half of a normal couple? Superpowered boyfriends all the way! Er, Spike, that is.

And the icon is wonderful. "Dear Diary, last night I made Angel happy and he killed a bunch of people. Is my makeup running? I'm so unhappy." Very funny.

[identity profile] ibmiller.livejournal.com 2006-07-14 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Kay, all splainied. Normal and Buffy - not so much. But I think you have it right. Though I do like Buffy and Angel - just not as much as Spike and Buffy. And perhaps they did have a relationship that included daily stuff by "The Prom" - it sort of seemed like it. Dunno.