elisi: Edwin holding a tiny snowman (lifeisduty by sdwolfpup.)
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2006-11-18 12:16 pm

Prophecies are tricky things...

Loyalty/Sleep Tight/Forgiveness are a fantastic trio of episodes, as good as anything in all of AtS. If I could I'd love to delve in deep and analyse it properly, but I really, really don't have the time at the moment. So for now all I'll focus on is the prophecy. You know the one: 'The father will kill the son.' Except of course Sahjhan says he changed it a little:

GUNN: You wrote the prophecies.
SAHJHAN: More a re-write.
FRED: "The father will kill the son."
SAHJHAN: Yeah. I flitted back and forth in time, changed the one that threatened me, polished some others. Flitted in a manly way. Just so we're clear.


The thing is, everyone sort of assumes that the whole thing was just false. But Sahjhan only claims that he *re-wrote* it. What did the original say? Well let's ask the Loa:

Wes: Is it true? Will Angel really kill his son as it says in the prophecies?
Loa: That the vampire will devour his child is certain.


'Devour' is an odd word. Could certainly be changed to 'kill' very easily. But it made me think of something else:

Male Oracle: There is one way. But it is not to be undertaken lightly.
Female Oracle: We swallow this day, as though it had never happened. Twenty-four hours from the moment the demon first attacked you, we take it back.
Angel: Then none of this happened and Buffy and I... What - what'll stop us from doing the exact same thing again?
Femal Oracle: You. You alone will carry the memory of this day. Can you carry that burden?


Angel *does* devour Connor - swallows up every memory of him that there ever was. Connor is erased from history, more thoroughly gone than if he'd been killed... and that's the sort of thing I find very interesting. Was any of it planned? Or did it all just join up pretty much seamlessly? Whatever the case, it is very satisfying.
ext_15233: (Default)

[identity profile] prophecygirrl.livejournal.com 2006-11-18 12:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Very cool. I find this insanely pleasing, too.

Thanks!

[identity profile] samifidler.livejournal.com 2006-11-18 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)
What a brilliant premise - why don't I ever think of things like that (headdesk) I really enjoy reading your analysis, and lurk here frequently. Thank you.

Sami

[identity profile] zimshan.livejournal.com 2006-11-18 03:56 pm (UTC)(link)
OH, MY. That is such a splendid way of looking at it. I don't even care whether they planned it at all. It's there. And that's very satisfying, indeed.
rahirah: (Default)

[personal profile] rahirah 2006-11-18 05:26 pm (UTC)(link)
The loa's prophecy was fullfilled, literally, exactly when the loa said it would be--when Angel drank the blood that was spiked with Connor's blood.

[identity profile] copykween.livejournal.com 2006-11-18 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Ohh....very neat! And you just gave me a *really* interesting idea! *scuttles off*

[identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com 2006-11-18 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd buy that. Or Rahira's interpretation.

[identity profile] curiouswombat.livejournal.com 2006-11-18 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Only to put the wind up people! But you are right - it would hardly seem the sort of thing that would need a prophecy...
yourlibrarian: Angel and Lindsey (ConnorPlease: raskolnikov5)

[personal profile] yourlibrarian 2006-11-18 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Great catch, that is a very interesting way of looking at events.
shapinglight: (Default)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2006-11-19 12:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree. The Buffyverse writers were so good at joining the dots - even if it was after the event.
ext_15284: a wreath of lightning against a dark, stormy sky (Default)

[identity profile] stormwreath.livejournal.com 2006-11-19 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I like your reinterpretation here, although personally I'd always assumed that 'the vampire will devour his child' was a reference to Angel drinking Connor's blood. The prophecy came literally true while getting everybody confused and worried about its wider implications, just like all good prophecies.

As for the question "why would there be a prophecy about something so minor?", well for starters this was, if I remember rightly, just a small part of a much larger prophecy. And secondly, most of the seers and prophets we've actually seen on 'Angel' have been rather flaky, to say the least. A prophecy doesn't necessarily have to be a Highly Significant Vision sent by the PtB; it could be more like the prophet has their mental TV set tuned to "next millennium", and is picking up random images that they can't really make sense of. So they write them down, and after a thousand years of mistranslation and inappropiate reverence we get the prophecies our characters use on the shows.