elisi: Clara asking the Doctor to take her back to 2012 (Faith play by binka_boo)
elisi ([personal profile] elisi) wrote2004-12-19 04:15 pm

Buffy bits 'n pieces from magazines

I'm tired of tidying up the same things for the 100th time, so I thought I'd post these tidbits from a couple of magazines that I've meant to share for ages, but I was concentrating on finishing 'The Summer After' (It's all done! Go read and give me feedback, because otherwise I'll wilt away... please?), so this was more or less forgotten.

Anyway, my brother-in-law bought me the Buffy Magazine some weeks ago (it makes me happy and my husband annoyed, so a double win from b-i-l’s POV!), and I just felt like sharing a few things from that issue (what plans did Joss have for Tara in s7?) and SFX (which I bought myself - but then with a headline like 'How Buffy changed everything' how could I resist?)


First from SFX (Dec 2004, issue #124):

A Joss Whedon quote:

“I designed Buffy to be an icon, to be an emotional experience, to be loved in a way that other shows can’t be loved,” explained Joss Whedon back in 2001. "I wanted her to be a cultural phenomenon. I wanted there to be dolls: Barbie with kung-fu grip. I wanted people to internalise it, and make up fantasies where they were in the story, to take it home with them, for it to exist beyond the tv-show. And we’ve done exactly that.”

Did someone say fanfiction?


Ever wanted to study BtVS in more depth? Well you can here:

The following questions are from the final exam for Middle Tennessee University’s Buffy module. Answer any two questions. Put up you hand if you need more paper.

1. Buffy creator Joss Whedon has spoken of “a religion in narrative” but claims to be an “angry atheist”. Why has BtVS promoted so much interest among the religious?

2. According to Whedon, Buffy always strove for what he calls “psychological realism”. How is Buffy The Vampire Slayer psychologically realistic?

3. I have noted on several occasions moments in BtVS that are quintessentially ”Buffy”. Offer your own definition of the Buffy “signature”.

4. Identify at least three genres BtVS hybridises and show how they manifest themselves in the series.

5. Pick a BtVS writer (see episode guide distributed in class) and offer a brief overview of his/her contribution to the Buffyverse.

6. Argue that “xxxx” is the finest BtVS episode and demonstrate why.

7. Argue that “xxxx” is the worst BtVS episode and demonstrate why.

8. Buffy the Vampire Slayer is both self-referential and intertextual. In an essay demonstrate how.

Wow! Well there are some essay-ideas if anyone is feeling bored...


Just one thing from The Buffy magazine (Dec 2004, issue #67):

AU S7:

Joss Whedon shocked fans at the San Diego Comic Con by revealing that he did have plans to resurrect Tara in Season Seven - and not as The First! As reported by the Mediasharx.com website, Joss explained that, “In one of the final episodes, the third to last episode, Buffy was going to basically get a ‘get out of jail free’ card - one completely reality-altering thing that she could have. She could bring Angel back to her, she could do anything she wanted.” He continued, “At the end of the episode she comes to Willow and says ‘Look at these shoes I got.’ and Willow’s like, ‘What?’ ‘I got these really awesome shoes. I wanted them, and now I have them!’ and Willow’s like ‘You... used... the wish... for shoes?’ and Buffy says ‘Of course not, you idiot,’ and walks out of the room, and Willow turns around and Tara’s standing behind her.”

Meep! The only upside I can think of, is that if this had happened, we wouldn’t have had ‘Touched’, and honestly - I’d rather have Spuffy than W/T. But that doesn’t mean that this can’t be endlessly used in fanfic! A nearly-canon way of bringing Tara back!



Also many thanks to [livejournal.com profile] fer1213 who bought me 2 more months of icon-space (Squee!) and [livejournal.com profile] lillianmorgan who sent me a Christmas card and a lovely mixed cd entitled 'Music To Watch Spuffy To' (more Squee!). Lots of hugs and smooches for both of you!

[identity profile] lillianmorgan.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 09:57 am (UTC)(link)
Oh ::contemplates fingernails:: is the CD any good?
plans to resurrect Tara in Season Seven
Crikey! This was the first I ever heard of this. I remember Amber Benson declined to appear in CWDP - but I wonder how serious this other idea was?
The essay questions make my head hurt.
::smooches back::

[identity profile] lillianmorgan.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 10:04 am (UTC)(link)
Oh - and did you watch 'Stage Beauty' last night? I really liked it.
::nods vehemently:: Me too, I cried at the end.

[identity profile] swsa.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 11:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, that Tara thing came out back in August. I like to believe he's just full of crap and saying what he thinks the W/T shippers want to hear, because that idea seriously sucks. First of all, did we not learn the "Resurrection is bad" lesson in S6? Why would Buffy, of all people, do the same thing to someone else? Also, it's just cheap, cheap, cheap. Having it be a wish is like a half-step above "it was all a dream" when it comes to lazy storytelling. Blech. There was much ranting about this on my flist back when he first said this, if you want to read some of it.

[identity profile] mikeygs.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 12:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Jeebus, those questions make my brain go hide under its bed. I don't think I'd ever be able to answer those questions as well I possibly could because BTVS is very personal to me. Exposing those private things for analysis by someone who is in a position to judge would make me uncomfortable and anxious. Yeah, it'd be bad.

No, that's not at all weird. Nope.

My personal feeling is that it was just Joss blowing smoke. AB has said that she didn't want to come back to play the FE because she didn't want Tara thought of that way. If Joss pitched that idea to her, I don't see why she'd say no. Besides, it's wicked lame, IMO. I like S7 bunches, but the whole 'Willow gets to be happy' thing annoyed me. If any scooby other than Buffy deserved happiness, it would have been Xander.

Like you, I'll take Spuffy over W/T any day. ;)

[identity profile] danceswithwords.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, I remember when the Tara thing hit. And yea, there was much gnashing of teeth across livejournal.

I think Whedon was talking out his ass, frankly. The man likes to tell stories. He's not a terribly reliable source about what went on behind the scenes on his own shows because he prefers the interesting story to the mundane truth. I'm sure it was an idea he had, but I can't imagine it even got to the stage where the writing team was talking about it. Because for one thing, the idea that Buffy would yank someone else out of heaven after what she went through is ludicrous, and for another, it wouldn't have meshed at all well with any of the rest of the plot and themes they'd been developing all season and that were all coming to a head at the point where Tara would have reappeared. In other words, what [livejournal.com profile] swsa said.

I'm sort of bummed I went to college before Buffy came out, because one of my degrees is mass communications and I did a lot of media study and analysis. At the time, the big thing was Madonna, but now it's Buffy, which would have made me a lot happier.

[identity profile] mikeygs.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Although I find it hard to believe that he'd use such a silly trick

Oh, I don't. Joss is no stranger to audience manipulation, but I would agree that there would have to be consequences for it. There is no indication of when this was supposed to happen in the timeline, but if it had happened toward the end, we might not have gotten to see them. But if all this was supposed to occur mid-season, I would have found it very distracting. The show is about Buffy, the Vampire Slayer, not Willow, the hitch-breathed, unstable witch and her awkward relationship issues.

I don't want to sound like I hate Willow because I don't. But I don't find her character the least bit interesting, either.

[identity profile] skylee.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
If it was just altering reality, then Tara wouldn't be yanked out of heaven, she simply wouldn't have died in the first place. I think what Joss meant was probably an AU rather than a resurrection. So that's a bit different than what Willow & the scoobies did to Buffy.

But I don't see how that could have fit in S7 either. It could work, but personally I prefer Spuffy too. ;-)

[identity profile] danceswithwords.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm. An AU would make more sense, but if Buffy had the opportunity to alter reality, they'd have had to do some severe wriggling to structure it in such a way that the natural choice was bringing Tara back/preventing her death rather than oh, say, using the chance to deal with the impending apocalypse.

It seems like Joss thought it was a cool idea, but it obviously never actually got hashed out at all. I've got nothing against Tara, but I'm glad--I actually don't think it would have worked, and the absolute last thing S7 needed was more incoherence and dangling plot threads. :)

[identity profile] swsa.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 05:05 pm (UTC)(link)
But even if it was an AU, I think Buffy had definitely learned by this point that it's best not to fuck around with that crap. I just can't under any circumstances see Buffy wanting to mess around with life and death. Not after what she went through.

[identity profile] mikeygs.livejournal.com 2004-12-19 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, see I don't remember reading that episode 20 stuff. Either the place I read it didn't include that part or my mind was already off in Tangentland when I got to it. :)

Still say it would've been a bad move, though. And I agree that it wouldn't fit, too jarring. Something like this would've need an overall restructure of S7 (no Kennedy, no EP, etc.), which makes me believe that it was nothing but empty talk.

Merry Christmas! in case I don't *see* you again for a while. :)
molly_may: (Be Calm - sdwolfpup)

[personal profile] molly_may 2004-12-19 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I think those essay questions are kind of fascinating, but it makes my brain hurt right now to contemplate answering them. In other words, I'd love to see someone else tackle them! Joss's quote about the religion in narrative that's used in the first question is one of the things he's said that's been the most intriguing to me, personally. It made me think about how important stories and storytelling are in my life.

[identity profile] skylee.livejournal.com 2004-12-20 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
they'd have had to do some severe wriggling to structure it in such a way that the natural choice was bringing Tara back/preventing her death rather than oh, say, using the chance to deal with the impending apocalypse.

That's a really good point. It probably wouldn't have worked if that wasn't sorted out. And I agree with what you said about it not being hashed out, as it is, it just doesn't fit into what happened and the big fight that the season was building up towards.

[identity profile] skylee.livejournal.com 2004-12-20 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
That's true. It would be against the general rule in the Jossverse if Buffy was to alter life and death like that, without some serious consequences. And she of all people wouldn't do that.