(no subject)

Date: 2 June 2017 11:33 am (UTC)
elisi: (Bill curious)
From: [personal profile] elisi
I meant to delve into this in more detail, but was too tired to...

I think the 'consent out of love' was a bit of a red herring, or possibly obscured by the language. It would be impossible for people to love the *Monks* on such short notice. So, it's obviously the case that the consent has to be *given* for love, and Bill fits because she wants to save the Doctor's life.

It's something to base their rule *on*, (see pure intent, fairy tales etc.), but I don't know that they would have needed the world's consent. Clearly they operate on 'people with power' rather than people power...

Also, I more than suspect that their 'rule' is a massive AU, and thus needed a single thing to activate it.
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
Account name:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.


Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.


elisi: (Default)elisi
October 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2017